Re: Why Won't You Answer, Glenn V.?

On 20 Mar 2021 22:26:20 -0000, BT George <[email protected]>
wrote:

>On Saturday, March 20, 2021 at 1:20:26 PM UTC-5, Glenn V. wrote:
>> On Saturday, March 20, 2021 at 1:24:37 AM UTC+1, John McAdams wrote: 
>> > On 20 Mar 2021 00:04:22 -0000, "Glenn V." <[email protected]> wrote: 
>> > >> > 
>> > >> I've answered you. 
>> > > 
>> > >No, you haven't. Go look at my questions again. 
>> > > 
>> > You didn't ask questions. You just bashed Republicans. 
>> > 
>> > Republicans want Voter ID. Democrats don't. 
>> > 
>> > Sweden has voter ID. 
>> > 
>> > Republicans want to ban mail-in voting. Democrats don't. 
>> > 
>> > Sweden does not allow mail-in voting. 
>> > 
>> > Republicans want to ban vote harvesting. Democrats don't. 
>> > 
>> > Sweden does not allow voter harvesting. 
>> > >> I've pointed out that the voting reforms 
>> > >> Republicans want are THE SAME PROCEDURES IN PLACE IN SWEDEN. 
>> > > 
>> > >Again, quit making things up out of thin air. Republicans are nowhere near 
>> > >wanting our system, as I've explained in detail. Do you understand this? 
>> > > 
>> > You explained no such thing.
>> That's exactly what I've done. You selecting some things, cutting out 
>> others displays only your dishonesty. Do you understand that this is 
>> transparent and embarrassing on your part?
>> > 
>> > You huffed and puffed about the evil Republicans, and then were 
>> > embarrassed when I pointed how Sweden handles elections.
>> Again, quit making things up and attribute your language to me. Do you 
>> understand that this shows your dishonesty? I've never used the word 
>> "evil". Your sinister and purposely false debate style is shameful.
>> > >> >FYI, I have very clear opinions on the tech companies' actions. 
>> > >> Then what are those opinions? 
>> > >> 
>> > Still no answer.
>> You don't decide what I answer. Neither do you get to decide that I should 
>> accept your change of subject. Do you understand this? 
>> 
>> I'll give you one last chance. What motivates making it illegal in Georgia 
>> to help feed voters in line? How is reducing the number of polling 
>> stations in certain districts motivated? Does this help eligible and 
>> registered voters? 
>> 
>> Do you understand that those are important questions? 
>> 
>
>John I admittedly haven't followed every post in this thread, or even the 
>details of the Georgia issue very much.  ...Though I would agree feeding 
>voters in line might well prove a way of "manipulating" votes from the 
>very poor and hungry, especially if the "feeders" would be able to 
>identify or show support as Dems or Republicans.  But I cannot see much 
>legitimate reason to reduce polling stations only in certain districts.  

Do you even know that is true?

And there could be no legitimate reason?  Like maybe, turnout is low
in those districts, or there are plenty of polling stations even after
the number is reduced?

>So if you haven't answered Glenn then I would call on you to "own" head 
>on your take of the motivation behind this.

Nonsense.  I don't even know it is true, and I certainly don't know
what the motivation is, if it is true.

Aren't you aware that the media lie a lot?  Remember, they said Trump
called white supremacists "good people."

And they lied about a call he made to a Georgia official.

And they lied about a guard at the Capitol in Washington being
bludgeoned by a fire extinguisher.


>If you answer that, then he will 
>be in no place to refuse to directly confirm his position on banning Trump 
>and other Conservatives.
>

Again, nonsense.  I don't even know whether his polling station claim
is true.

But he knows perfectly well whether he approves of Trump being banned.

Why do you think he won't answer?

.John
-------------------------------
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm