Re: Why Won't You Answer, Glenn V.?

On Saturday, March 20, 2021 at 6:38:42 PM UTC-4, John McAdams wrote:
> On 20 Mar 2021 22:26:20 -0000, BT George <[email protected]>
> wrote: 
> 
> >On Saturday, March 20, 2021 at 1:20:26 PM UTC-5, Glenn V. wrote: 
> >> On Saturday, March 20, 2021 at 1:24:37 AM UTC+1, John McAdams wrote: 
> >> > On 20 Mar 2021 00:04:22 -0000, "Glenn V." <[email protected]> wrote: 
> >> > >> > 
> >> > >> I've answered you. 
> >> > > 
> >> > >No, you haven't. Go look at my questions again. 
> >> > > 
> >> > You didn't ask questions. You just bashed Republicans. 
> >> > 
> >> > Republicans want Voter ID. Democrats don't. 
> >> > 
> >> > Sweden has voter ID. 
> >> > 
> >> > Republicans want to ban mail-in voting. Democrats don't. 
> >> > 
> >> > Sweden does not allow mail-in voting. 
> >> > 
> >> > Republicans want to ban vote harvesting. Democrats don't. 
> >> > 
> >> > Sweden does not allow voter harvesting. 
> >> > >> I've pointed out that the voting reforms 
> >> > >> Republicans want are THE SAME PROCEDURES IN PLACE IN SWEDEN. 
> >> > > 
> >> > >Again, quit making things up out of thin air. Republicans are nowhere near 
> >> > >wanting our system, as I've explained in detail. Do you understand this? 
> >> > > 
> >> > You explained no such thing. 
> >> That's exactly what I've done. You selecting some things, cutting out 
> >> others displays only your dishonesty. Do you understand that this is 
> >> transparent and embarrassing on your part? 
> >> > 
> >> > You huffed and puffed about the evil Republicans, and then were 
> >> > embarrassed when I pointed how Sweden handles elections. 
> >> Again, quit making things up and attribute your language to me. Do you 
> >> understand that this shows your dishonesty? I've never used the word 
> >> "evil". Your sinister and purposely false debate style is shameful. 
> >> > >> >FYI, I have very clear opinions on the tech companies' actions. 
> >> > >> Then what are those opinions? 
> >> > >> 
> >> > Still no answer. 
> >> You don't decide what I answer. Neither do you get to decide that I should 
> >> accept your change of subject. Do you understand this? 
> >> 
> >> I'll give you one last chance. What motivates making it illegal in Georgia 
> >> to help feed voters in line? How is reducing the number of polling 
> >> stations in certain districts motivated? Does this help eligible and 
> >> registered voters? 
> >> 
> >> Do you understand that those are important questions? 
> >> 
> > 
> >John I admittedly haven't followed every post in this thread, or even the 
> >details of the Georgia issue very much. ...Though I would agree feeding 
> >voters in line might well prove a way of "manipulating" votes from the 
> >very poor and hungry, especially if the "feeders" would be able to 
> >identify or show support as Dems or Republicans. But I cannot see much 
> >legitimate reason to reduce polling stations only in certain districts.
> Do you even know that is true? 
> 
> And there could be no legitimate reason? Like maybe, turnout is low 
> in those districts, or there are plenty of polling stations even after 
> the number is reduced?
> >So if you haven't answered Glenn then I would call on you to "own" head 
> >on your take of the motivation behind this.
> Nonsense. I don't even know it is true, and I certainly don't know 
> what the motivation is, if it is true. 
> 
> Aren't you aware that the media lie a lot? Remember, they said Trump 
> called white supremacists "good people." 
> 
> And they lied about a call he made to a Georgia official. 

  I just came across this...

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKQlH_pPJjQ

  Trump was right that fake news being the enemy of the people. The media 
doesn`t even care that they have no credibility, and leftists don`t seem 
to mind being constantly lied to by them.

  And it looks like Whitmer is caught doing the same as Cuomo putting 
infected Covid patients in nursing homes...

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=At-mZWJsLXA

> And they lied about a guard at the Capitol in Washington being 
> bludgeoned by a fire extinguisher.
> >If you answer that, then he will 
> >be in no place to refuse to directly confirm his position on banning Trump 
> >and other Conservatives. 
> >
> Again, nonsense. I don't even know whether his polling station claim 
> is true. 
> 
> But he knows perfectly well whether he approves of Trump being banned. 
> 
> Why do you think he won't answer? 
> 
> .John 
> ------------------------------- 
> http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm