Re: Capitol Mob - "Pretty Normal People"
Bud <[email protected]> 24 Mar 2021 03:10:21 -0000
| Newsgroups | alt.assassination.jfk |
|---|---|
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sunday, March 7, 2021 at 4:43:56 PM UTC-5, John Corbett wrote: > On Sunday, March 7, 2021 at 12:34:41 PM UTC-5, Bud wrote: > > On Saturday, March 6, 2021 at 3:56:46 PM UTC-5, John Corbett wrote: > > > On Saturday, March 6, 2021 at 12:55:13 PM UTC-5, Bud wrote: > > > > On Friday, March 5, 2021 at 9:06:54 PM UTC-5, ajohnstone wrote: > > > > > >I suppose I have an advantage over you ... He wasn`t killed at the riot. > > > > > >He texted his brother that the only thing that happened to him was that > > > > > >he was hit by some bear spray. He went back to the precinct and had a > > > > > >heart attack. > > > > > Sorry to rain on your parade but i had already linked to this incident in > > > > > an earlier post > > > > I brought it up three weeks ago over in the nuthouse in a post to Don > > > > Willis. He actually believes what the mainstream media tells him. > > > > > > > > https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/wudxrx_FIjo/m/8UyZ1ybLBQAJ > > > > > https://greenwald.substack.com/p/the-false-and-exaggerated-claims > > > > > > > > > > The author went into some detail about the Sicknick death and explained > > > > > the motive behind the deliberate misrepresentation. > > > > > > > > > > "...Without Sicknick having his skull bashed in with a fire extinguisher, > > > > > there were no deaths that day that could be attributed to deliberate > > > > > violence by pro-Trump protesters..." > > > > > > > > > > You are not the only one who accesses information from sources other than > > > > > the mainstream media. > > > > You quoted me out of context. What I said was... > > > > "I suppose I have an advantage over you because I never believed anything > > > > the Democrats or the mainstream media had to say about the event." > > > > I don`t believe anything they say unless I can corroborate it myself > > > > using sources I trust. They don`t have zero credibility, they are in the > > > > red. The idea that five people died as a result of the Capitol incident > > > > was never the default that needed to be disproven with me. > > > > > > > > Do you think that if a cop went back to his precinct after battling BLM > > > > rioters and died of a stroke you would have heard about it? Other than Fox > > > > news the MSM is all spin, lies and propaganda for the Democratic Party. > > > > And liberals seem to think that holding Fox as an exception is > > > > hypocritical, but not when they expose lies like this cop being killed by > > > > violent Trump supporters. When they tell the truth and expose lies that > > > > gains them credibility in my eyes, leftists seem to prefer the lies they > > > > are told, they tenaciously hold onto these false narratives. > > > It's a sad commentary on the mainstream media that we can't take their > > > word for ANYTHING. How can I trust people to accurately report the news > > > when they have such an obvious bias and agenda. Even if they are telling > > > me the truth, they are only telling half of it, the half they won't me to > > > know. > > > > > > It is an absolute disgrace that they ran with the story for weeks that a > > > Capitol cop had been murdered during the riot and when they finally did > > > fess up, they did so without a hint of remorse. Most of the people who > > > control the information that the public is receiving are complete scumbags > > > who don't deserve an ounce of respect and most people don't give them any. > > > I have more respect for drug dealers, pimps, and whores than I do for the > > > most of the people that report the news. At least they are giving people > > > what they pay for. > > This new liberalism seems totally unprincipled to me, it seems very "the > > end justifies the means", if they can fib or spin information it is ok if > > it helps save the planet (in their eyes) or helps fight racism (in their > > eyes). Since all the people at the Capitol event are convicted racists in > > the eyes of the left anything done to them is fine. > > > > I generally avoid the MSM, but when I sign out of my email on AOL there > > are usually some headlines and I might click on one if the headline baits > > me. > > > That's pretty much how I stay current. My homepage brings up headlines > froa variety of sources. Mostly liberal ones but a few conservative sites. > The sad thing is NOBODY is reporting straight news any more. I quit > subscribing to the Columbus Dispatch years ago. I can't remember the last > time I watched the nightly news on any of the networks. It used to be I > couldn't watch MSNBC or CNN for more than 30 seconds before I was ready to > punch somebody in the mouth but I've moved beyond that. Now I want to > strangle them. Notice that when a white guy shot those Asian workers at the massage parlors a few days back the immediate contrived narrative of the Democrats/Media was that racism was the cause. When a brown person shoots a bunch of white people in Boulder, the immediate contrived narrative of the Democrats/Media is that the gun is to blame. > > Today it was this one... > > > > "Fighting Biden virus aid, GOP rekindles Obama-era strategy." > > > > I clicked to find out what "strategy" was being "rekindled" and found > > out the strategy was telling the truth. The first paragraph has this... > > > > "Republicans have one goal for President Joe Biden’s $1.9 > > trillion COVID-19 relief package: to erode public support for the rescue > > plan by portraying it as too big, too bloated and too much wasteful public > > spending for a pandemic that’s almost over." > > > > Calling it what it is is portrayed as some ploy to fool the public. > The one thing the MSM can't stand is somebody telling the truth. That's > dirty pool. > > > > https://www.aol.com/news/fighting-biden-virus-aid-gop-052006685-125614295.html > > > > A huge chunk of money is going to bail out blue states so they can > > continue to do the things that put them in the red in the first place. > > > > Another headline was about the impending Chauvin trial. There will be > > nationwide riots because, why not? Looting and destruction has been > > decriminalized. The only thing that will stop this from occurring time and > > time again is a zero tolerance policy like that shown with the Capitol > > protests. > > > Last summer the left decided that rioting was a legitimate form of protest > as long as it is the left that is doing the rioting. If the right does it, > it's an insurrection. > > https://www.aol.com/news/minneapolis-prepares-potential-unrest-ahead-110046142.html > > > > You see a lot of talk about emotion in these articles, unfortunately it > > carries no weight in a courtroom (or shouldn`t, anyway). These people are > > bound to be disappointed. > > > > Democrats are always there to throw fuel on the fire... > > > > “We know that this trial is going to reignite the same kind of > > emotional and social response that we saw last summer,” the > > councilman said. > > > > Hilarious that they are afraid that white supremacists are going to show > > up and start trouble. That is the least of their worries. > I think it's going to be very difficult to get a conviction one the murder > charge and some level manslaughter is the likely result with Chauvin > serving no more than a couple of years. A hung jury is a distinct > possibility too. Neither one of those will appease the left and we can > count on renewed rioting, excuse me, I meant renewed mostly peaceful > protests.