Re: De Gaulle's Observation

Bud <[email protected]> 10 Apr 2021 23:33:02 -0000
Newsgroups alt.assassination.jfk
Organization PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Saturday, April 10, 2021 at 12:36:53 PM UTC-4, ajohnstone wrote:
> https://dissidentvoice.org/2021/04/a-damned-murder-inc-kennedys-battle-ag=
ainst-the-leviathan/#more-115044=20
>=20
> After returning from Kennedy=E2=80=99s funeral, de Gaulle and his=20
> information minister Alain Peyrefitte had a discussion recorded in=20
> Peyrefitte=E2=80=99s memoire =E2=80=9CC=E2=80=99=C3=A9tait de=20
> Gaulle,=E2=80=9D=20
>=20
> "...What happened to Kennedy is what nearly happened to me=E2=80=A6 His=
=20
> story is the same as mine. =E2=80=A6 It looks like a cowboy story, but=20
> it=E2=80=99s only an OAS [Secret Army Organization] story. The security=
=20
> forces were in cahoots with the extremists.=20
>=20
> =E2=80=A6Security forces are all the same when they do this kind of dirty=
=20
> work. As soon as they succeed in wiping out the false assassin, they=20
> declare the justice system no longer need be concerned, that no further=
=20
> public action was needed now that the guilty perpetrator was dead. Better=
=20
> to assassinate an innocent man than to let a civil war break out. Better=
=20
> an injustice than disorder.=20
>=20
> America is in danger of upheavals. But you=E2=80=99ll see. All of them=20
> together will observe the law of silence. They will close ranks.=20
> They=E2=80=99ll do everything to stifle any scandal. They will throw=20
> Noah=E2=80=99s cloak over these shameful deeds. In order to not lose face=
=20
> in front of the whole world. In order to not risk unleashing riots in the=
=20
> United States. In order to preserve the union and to avoid a new civil=20
> war. In order to not ask themselves questions. They don=E2=80=99t want to=
=20
> know. They don=E2=80=99t want to find out. They won=E2=80=99t allow=20
> themselves to find out."=20
>=20
> I don't necessarily go along with De Gaulle. After all his information on=
=20
> the assassination would be hearsay. But i still think his rationalization=
=20
> has some merit, that the Establishment would rather create a conspiracy=
=20
> than to confess to any incompetence.

  Similar to a lot of conspiracy hobbyist rhetoric, a lot of hot air that 
doesn`t take you anywhere, provides no leads or anything of substance to 
scrutinize. Just "this is how I think the forces in place operate or would 
operate".