Re: De Gaulle's Observation
John Corbett <[email protected]> 11 Apr 2021 02:05:16 -0000
| Newsgroups | alt.assassination.jfk |
|---|---|
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Saturday, April 10, 2021 at 12:36:53 PM UTC-4, ajohnstone wrote: > https://dissidentvoice.org/2021/04/a-damned-murder-inc-kennedys-battle-ag= ainst-the-leviathan/#more-115044=20 >=20 > After returning from Kennedy=E2=80=99s funeral, de Gaulle and his=20 > information minister Alain Peyrefitte had a discussion recorded in=20 > Peyrefitte=E2=80=99s memoire =E2=80=9CC=E2=80=99=C3=A9tait de=20 > Gaulle,=E2=80=9D=20 >=20 > "...What happened to Kennedy is what nearly happened to me=E2=80=A6 His= =20 > story is the same as mine. =E2=80=A6 It looks like a cowboy story, but=20 > it=E2=80=99s only an OAS [Secret Army Organization] story. The security= =20 > forces were in cahoots with the extremists.=20 >=20 > =E2=80=A6Security forces are all the same when they do this kind of dirty= =20 > work. As soon as they succeed in wiping out the false assassin, they=20 > declare the justice system no longer need be concerned, that no further= =20 > public action was needed now that the guilty perpetrator was dead. Better= =20 > to assassinate an innocent man than to let a civil war break out. Better= =20 > an injustice than disorder.=20 >=20 > America is in danger of upheavals. But you=E2=80=99ll see. All of them=20 > together will observe the law of silence. They will close ranks.=20 > They=E2=80=99ll do everything to stifle any scandal. They will throw=20 > Noah=E2=80=99s cloak over these shameful deeds. In order to not lose face= =20 > in front of the whole world. In order to not risk unleashing riots in the= =20 > United States. In order to preserve the union and to avoid a new civil=20 > war. In order to not ask themselves questions. They don=E2=80=99t want to= =20 > know. They don=E2=80=99t want to find out. They won=E2=80=99t allow=20 > themselves to find out."=20 >=20 > I don't necessarily go along with De Gaulle. After all his information on= =20 > the assassination would be hearsay. But i still think his rationalization= =20 > has some merit, that the Establishment would rather create a conspiracy= =20 > than to confess to any incompetence. A lot of people suspected a conspiracy after Ruby shot Oswald but the evidence for such never panned out. The assassination of JFK has been the most investigated crime in history both by official investigations and the amateur sleuths yet in over 57 years no one has come up with a scrap of credible evidence that anybody but Oswald took part in the crime. All the evidence points to the assassination being a crime of opportunity committed by a disgruntled little lose with a cheap imported rifle.