Re: Rittenhouse not guilty in at least some jurors minds

On 19 Nov 2021, Rudy Canoza <[email protected]> posted some
news:[email protected]: 

> On 11/19/2021 12:08 PM, Matt wrote:
>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 08:35:08 -0500, "Scout"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>>
>>>
>>> "Matt" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>> On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 11:46:03 -0800, Rudy Canoza <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 11/18/2021 11:19 AM, Matt wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 07:06:10 -0500, Yak <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/18/21 12:30 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>> The jurors have deliberated for two full days.  It it were as
>>>>>>>> "obvious"
>>>>>>>> that he killed in self defense as the right-wingnuts claim
>>>>>>>> (they're lying about "obvious"), he would have been acquitted
>>>>>>>> by now. We all know
>>>>>>>> this.  He *hasn't* been acquitted.  He might still be, but he
>>>>>>>> hasn't been. The prospect that he might be convicted of some
>>>>>>>> form of illegal homicide is heartening to all right-thinking
>>>>>>>> Americans.  The objective facts in plain sight say that
>>>>>>>> Rittenhouse murdered to people and illegally shot a third.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The jurors have deliberated for two full days.  It it were as
>>>>>>> "obvious" that he murdered *to* people as you left-wingnuts
>>>>>>> claim he would have been convicted by now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Is there reasonable doubt?   No matter how the verdict goes I
>>>>>>     expect 
>>>>>> mob violence from the left.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You're a fucking moron.  People on the left *want* the murdering
>>>>> white supremacist punk to be convicted, so if he is, they will not
>>>>> engage in violence.
>>>>
>>>>    This tells me you haven't been following a good news source. 
>>>>    There 
>>>> are many different charges he could be convicted of, what if he is
>>>> just charged with theh lessor charge like "COUNT 6: POSSESSION OF A
>>>> DANGEROUS WEAPON BY A PERSON UNDER 18".
>>>>
>>>> Would that to you make looting and burning permissible?
>>>
>>> Well, since that charge has been pulled by the judge, it's no longer
>>> a possibility.
>>>
>>> Which frankly should never have been filed since Wisconsin law is
>>> very clear on this and the exemption set forth in section 3c clearly
>>> applies to a 17 year old armed with a long barreled rifle.
>>>
>> 
>> There is to much of the Mob and politics in this case.  What [sic] do
>> the mobs outside the courthouse think they have a [sic] say?
>> 
> 
> Try one of these instead, as I'm an illiterate cocksucker:
> 
>     *Why* do the mobs outside the courthouse think they have a say?
> 
>         -or-
> 
>     What do the mobs outside the courthouse think they have *to* say?
> 
> What I wrote is, as usually, bullshit.

The bottom line is Kyle Rittenhouse was found not guilty by a jury of his 
peers.

Nothing you can say or lie about will ever change that now.