Re: Manmade Global Warming is absolutely unreal

"D" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> 
> On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, Scout wrote:
> 
>> "J Gillis" wrote   
>> Rudy Canoza posted   
>>> 
>>>>> Here is the graph of the past 5 million years of global temperature
>>>> 
>>>> No, it isn't.
>>> 
>>> Restored.
>>> 
>>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GHWnG_bbgAAhQCI?format=jpg&name=large
>>> 
>>> Added
>>> 
>>> Bell, L. (2011). Climate of corruption: Politics and power behind the
>>> global warming hoax. Austin, TX: Greenleaf Book Group Press.
>>
>> Heck, let's get even more specific.. here's the chart for the last 2,000 
>> years. showing that global temperatures have been hotter and colder MULTIPLE 
>> times in the last 2000 years. So whether global temperatures are increasing 
>> or decreasing all depends on the PERIOD OF TIME you're looking at.
>>
>> Further until we can explain how and why the temperatures changed 
>> historically we can not establish whether the current change is or is not 
>> part of the normal events.
>>
>> https://www.drroyspencer.com/global-warming-background-articles/2000-years-of-global-temperatures.
> 
> The problems with this argument are two.
> 
> 1. It's cherry picked. I'm not a climate hysteric, but when debating with 
> climate hysterics, they just choose another graph that shows that the 
> earth is ending. So "graph against graph".
> 
> 2. Like the graph of the climate hysteric, this graph is also heavily 
> worked on with statistical tools to adjust for various things. Depending 
> on how you work the statistics, your graph will either point to dooms day 
> scenarios, or to climate change being a natural phenomenon.
> 
> This is also the problem with all climate hysterics based on "models". I 
> can create a model that shows that all is good, just as well as one that 
> shows everyone dies tomorrow.
> 
> As long as politics has decided that every will die, and money and media 
> is in on it, any scientific debate is meaningless.

  "We redistribute de facto the world's wealth 
    by climate policy. One has to free oneself 
    from the illusion that international climate 
    policy is environmental policy any more."  
                ~ Ottmar Edenhofer, IPCC

In other words. There is, an *agenda*.<----

> The only thing, I believe, that will end climate hysteria, is when the 
> politicians push their politics of repentance and sacrifice too far, 
> making it difficult or impossible for regular people to live their lives. 
> _Then_ will see a massive rage, over reaction, and an authoritarian 
> politician ripping away all green madness, and the earth will then not 
> collapse. Perhaps after the authoritarian, the earlth can then proceed 
> with business as usual. But I expect a severe and maybe violent 
> overreaction once regular people get tired of the current climate priests.