Re: Manmade Global Warming is absolutely unreal

  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

--8323328-1475711062-1709384112=:31904
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT



On Sat, 2 Mar 2024, Dawn Flood wrote:

> On 3/1/2024 3:23 AM, D wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, Dawn Flood wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2/29/2024 3:27 PM, Scout wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> "J Gillis" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>> On 28 Feb 2024, Rudy Canoza <[email protected]> posted some
>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Here is the graph of the past 5 million years of global temperature
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> No, it isn't.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Restored.
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GHWnG_bbgAAhQCI?format=jpg&name=large
>>>>> 
>>>>> Added
>>>>> 
>>>>> Bell, L. (2011). Climate of corruption: Politics and power behind the
>>>>> global warming hoax. Austin, TX: Greenleaf Book Group Press.
>>>> 
>>>> Heck, let's get even more specific.. here's the chart for the last 2,000 
>>>> years. showing that global temperatures have been hotter and colder 
>>>> MULTIPLE times in the last 2000 years. So whether global temperatures are 
>>>> increasing or decreasing all depends on the PERIOD OF TIME you're looking 
>>>> at.
>>>> 
>>>> Further until we can explain how and why the temperatures changed 
>>>> historically we can not establish whether the current change is or is not 
>>>> part of the normal events.
>>>> 
>>>> https://www.drroyspencer.com/global-warming-background-articles/2000-years-of-global-temperatures.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> This is just Insanity on Parade.  The IPCC uses dozens of climate models 
>>> in their climate forecasts:
>>> 
>>> https://www.carbonbrief.org/cmip6-the-next-generation-of-climate-models-explained/
>>> 
>>> It's easy "hand waving" to say that all of these climate models are wrong, 
>>> but the fact is that the seminal paper on global warming was published in 
>>> the journal Science in May 1967:
>>> 
>>> https://history.aip.org/climate/timeline.htm
>>> 
>>> As for our World being warmer in the past, yep, such is true, but mammals, 
>>> especially we H. Sapiens, are recent newcomers.  To stay alive, yours and 
>>> mine's bodies require a mostly constant temperature, which means that at 
>>> 50C, you will last about a day before succumbing to "natural causes".
>>> 
>>> Dawn
>> 
>> Ah, but let's not forget that there is one thing that separate good old 
>> "homo S" from the animals and that is technology. Plenty of arabians 
>> walking around and they regularly experience 40-50 C and thrive, due to 
>> technology.
>> 
>> Also, there is no proof that we'll have a global temperature of 50 over the 
>> planet. It could be 40, 30, it could be 0, in the very long term, we have 
>> no clue.
>> 
>> But no hysterics necessary, climate change is natural, and homo S will 
>> survived thanks to technology regardless of how the temperature shifts.
>
> To kill all of the life in a given area does not require "a global 
> temperature of 50 over the planet", but only 50C for 12 hours in a given 
> area.  In statistics, one has the arithmetic mean but then one also has the 
> variance.

That is incorrect. There is life living in way hotter areas than 50C quite 
happily. Further, humans have technology.
--8323328-1475711062-1709384112=:31904--