Re: Manmade Global Warming is absolutely unreal

On 3/2/2024 6:55 AM, D wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sat, 2 Mar 2024, Dawn Flood wrote:
> 
>> On 3/1/2024 3:23 AM, D wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, Dawn Flood wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/29/2024 3:27 PM, Scout wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "J Gillis" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>> On 28 Feb 2024, Rudy Canoza <[email protected]> posted some
>>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here is the graph of the past 5 million years of global temperature
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, it isn't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Restored.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GHWnG_bbgAAhQCI?format=jpg&name=large
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Added
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bell, L. (2011). Climate of corruption: Politics and power behind the
>>>>>> global warming hoax. Austin, TX: Greenleaf Book Group Press.
>>>>>
>>>>> Heck, let's get even more specific.. here's the chart for the last 
>>>>> 2,000 years. showing that global temperatures have been hotter and 
>>>>> colder MULTIPLE times in the last 2000 years. So whether global 
>>>>> temperatures are increasing or decreasing all depends on the PERIOD 
>>>>> OF TIME you're looking at.
>>>>>
>>>>> Further until we can explain how and why the temperatures changed 
>>>>> historically we can not establish whether the current change is or 
>>>>> is not part of the normal events.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.drroyspencer.com/global-warming-background-articles/2000-years-of-global-temperatures.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is just Insanity on Parade.  The IPCC uses dozens of climate 
>>>> models in their climate forecasts:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.carbonbrief.org/cmip6-the-next-generation-of-climate-models-explained/
>>>>
>>>> It's easy "hand waving" to say that all of these climate models are 
>>>> wrong, but the fact is that the seminal paper on global warming was 
>>>> published in the journal Science in May 1967:
>>>>
>>>> https://history.aip.org/climate/timeline.htm
>>>>
>>>> As for our World being warmer in the past, yep, such is true, but 
>>>> mammals, especially we H. Sapiens, are recent newcomers.  To stay 
>>>> alive, yours and mine's bodies require a mostly constant 
>>>> temperature, which means that at 50C, you will last about a day 
>>>> before succumbing to "natural causes".
>>>>
>>>> Dawn
>>>
>>> Ah, but let's not forget that there is one thing that separate good 
>>> old "homo S" from the animals and that is technology. Plenty of 
>>> arabians walking around and they regularly experience 40-50 C and 
>>> thrive, due to technology.
>>>
>>> Also, there is no proof that we'll have a global temperature of 50 
>>> over the planet. It could be 40, 30, it could be 0, in the very long 
>>> term, we have no clue.
>>>
>>> But no hysterics necessary, climate change is natural, and homo S 
>>> will survived thanks to technology regardless of how the temperature 
>>> shifts.
>>
>> To kill all of the life in a given area does not require "a global 
>> temperature of 50 over the planet", but only 50C for 12 hours in a 
>> given area.  In statistics, one has the arithmetic mean but then one 
>> also has the variance.
> 
> That is incorrect. There is life living in way hotter areas than 50C 
> quite happily. Further, humans have technology.

Other than plants, reptiles & bacteria, please indicate which mammalian 
species can survive for long periods of time at 50C?

Dawn