Re: Manmade Global Warming is absolutely unreal
"Scout" <[email protected]> Mon, 4 Mar 2024 16:44:21 -0500
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.society.liberalism,alt.atheism,alt.asshole.al-gore,alt.politics.democrats.d,talk.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Dawn Flood" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > On 3/2/2024 6:55 AM, D wrote: >> >> >> On Sat, 2 Mar 2024, Dawn Flood wrote: >> >>> On 3/1/2024 3:23 AM, D wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, Dawn Flood wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2/29/2024 3:27 PM, Scout wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "J Gillis" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>>> news:[email protected]... >>>>>>> On 28 Feb 2024, Rudy Canoza <[email protected]> posted some >>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Here is the graph of the past 5 million years of global >>>>>>>>> temperature >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No, it isn't. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Restored. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GHWnG_bbgAAhQCI?format=jpg&name=large >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Added >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bell, L. (2011). Climate of corruption: Politics and power behind >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> global warming hoax. Austin, TX: Greenleaf Book Group Press. >>>>>> >>>>>> Heck, let's get even more specific.. here's the chart for the last >>>>>> 2,000 years. showing that global temperatures have been hotter and >>>>>> colder MULTIPLE times in the last 2000 years. So whether global >>>>>> temperatures are increasing or decreasing all depends on the PERIOD >>>>>> OF TIME you're looking at. >>>>>> >>>>>> Further until we can explain how and why the temperatures changed >>>>>> historically we can not establish whether the current change is or is >>>>>> not part of the normal events. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.drroyspencer.com/global-warming-background-articles/2000-years-of-global-temperatures. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This is just Insanity on Parade. The IPCC uses dozens of climate >>>>> models in their climate forecasts: >>>>> >>>>> https://www.carbonbrief.org/cmip6-the-next-generation-of-climate-models-explained/ >>>>> >>>>> It's easy "hand waving" to say that all of these climate models are >>>>> wrong, but the fact is that the seminal paper on global warming was >>>>> published in the journal Science in May 1967: >>>>> >>>>> https://history.aip.org/climate/timeline.htm >>>>> >>>>> As for our World being warmer in the past, yep, such is true, but >>>>> mammals, especially we H. Sapiens, are recent newcomers. To stay >>>>> alive, yours and mine's bodies require a mostly constant temperature, >>>>> which means that at 50C, you will last about a day before succumbing >>>>> to "natural causes". >>>>> >>>>> Dawn >>>> >>>> Ah, but let's not forget that there is one thing that separate good old >>>> "homo S" from the animals and that is technology. Plenty of arabians >>>> walking around and they regularly experience 40-50 C and thrive, due to >>>> technology. >>>> >>>> Also, there is no proof that we'll have a global temperature of 50 over >>>> the planet. It could be 40, 30, it could be 0, in the very long term, >>>> we have no clue. >>>> >>>> But no hysterics necessary, climate change is natural, and homo S will >>>> survived thanks to technology regardless of how the temperature shifts. >>> >>> To kill all of the life in a given area does not require "a global >>> temperature of 50 over the planet", but only 50C for 12 hours in a given >>> area. In statistics, one has the arithmetic mean but then one also has >>> the variance. >> >> That is incorrect. There is life living in way hotter areas than 50C >> quite happily. Further, humans have technology. > > Other than plants, reptiles & bacteria, please indicate which mammalian > species can survive for long periods of time at 50C? > > Dawn Humans.