Re: Manmade Global Warming is absolutely unreal

"Scout" <[email protected]> Mon, 4 Mar 2024 16:44:21 -0500
Newsgroups alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.society.liberalism,alt.atheism,alt.asshole.al-gore,alt.politics.democrats.d,talk.politics.guns
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <[email protected]>

"Dawn Flood" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
news:[email protected]...
> On 3/2/2024 6:55 AM, D wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 2 Mar 2024, Dawn Flood wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/1/2024 3:23 AM, D wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 29 Feb 2024, Dawn Flood wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/29/2024 3:27 PM, Scout wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "J Gillis" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>> On 28 Feb 2024, Rudy Canoza <[email protected]> posted some
>>>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here is the graph of the past 5 million years of global 
>>>>>>>>> temperature
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, it isn't.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Restored.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GHWnG_bbgAAhQCI?format=jpg&name=large
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Added
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bell, L. (2011). Climate of corruption: Politics and power behind 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> global warming hoax. Austin, TX: Greenleaf Book Group Press.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Heck, let's get even more specific.. here's the chart for the last 
>>>>>> 2,000 years. showing that global temperatures have been hotter and 
>>>>>> colder MULTIPLE times in the last 2000 years. So whether global 
>>>>>> temperatures are increasing or decreasing all depends on the PERIOD 
>>>>>> OF TIME you're looking at.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Further until we can explain how and why the temperatures changed 
>>>>>> historically we can not establish whether the current change is or is 
>>>>>> not part of the normal events.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.drroyspencer.com/global-warming-background-articles/2000-years-of-global-temperatures.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is just Insanity on Parade.  The IPCC uses dozens of climate 
>>>>> models in their climate forecasts:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.carbonbrief.org/cmip6-the-next-generation-of-climate-models-explained/
>>>>>
>>>>> It's easy "hand waving" to say that all of these climate models are 
>>>>> wrong, but the fact is that the seminal paper on global warming was 
>>>>> published in the journal Science in May 1967:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://history.aip.org/climate/timeline.htm
>>>>>
>>>>> As for our World being warmer in the past, yep, such is true, but 
>>>>> mammals, especially we H. Sapiens, are recent newcomers.  To stay 
>>>>> alive, yours and mine's bodies require a mostly constant temperature, 
>>>>> which means that at 50C, you will last about a day before succumbing 
>>>>> to "natural causes".
>>>>>
>>>>> Dawn
>>>>
>>>> Ah, but let's not forget that there is one thing that separate good old 
>>>> "homo S" from the animals and that is technology. Plenty of arabians 
>>>> walking around and they regularly experience 40-50 C and thrive, due to 
>>>> technology.
>>>>
>>>> Also, there is no proof that we'll have a global temperature of 50 over 
>>>> the planet. It could be 40, 30, it could be 0, in the very long term, 
>>>> we have no clue.
>>>>
>>>> But no hysterics necessary, climate change is natural, and homo S will 
>>>> survived thanks to technology regardless of how the temperature shifts.
>>>
>>> To kill all of the life in a given area does not require "a global 
>>> temperature of 50 over the planet", but only 50C for 12 hours in a given 
>>> area.  In statistics, one has the arithmetic mean but then one also has 
>>> the variance.
>>
>> That is incorrect. There is life living in way hotter areas than 50C 
>> quite happily. Further, humans have technology.
>
> Other than plants, reptiles & bacteria, please indicate which mammalian 
> species can survive for long periods of time at 50C?
>
> Dawn

Humans.