Ed Wollmann Spams Usenet Part II

Back to top
From: Andrew Gierth <[email protected]>
Subject: EMP Cancelled: [email protected]: BI = 42.71
Date: 19 Nov 1998 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Approved: [email protected]
X-Mayan-Date: Long count = 12.19.5.12.12; tzolkin = 4 Eb; haab = 
5 Ceh
Followup-To: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
Organization: disorganised
X-Attribution: AG
X-Pgp-0x0E9FFBE9: 87 25 7F 14 41 24 B3 51 E0 19 8B DE 49 74 0C 29
X-P-Persistent-Headers: are a bad idea.
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.bulletins, news.admin.net-
abuse.usenet, alt.astrology

Followup-spamming (following up to different posts, repeatedly 
adding
the same text). Or as the Spam Thresholds FAQ puts it, "articles 
which
consist of inclusions of other user's postings, but are otherwise
identical".

The articles listed here all consist of exactly:

- a quote in full of another post (with or without headers)
- a signature (always the same)
- no other additional content

Earthlink: please deal appropriately with your user.

20 articles were cancelled in 20 groups. The Breidbart Index was 
42.71

-----begin sample article-----
>Path: ...!feed1.news.rcn.net! rcn!howland.erols.net! 
newsfeed.berkeley.edu! su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com! la-news-
feed1.bbnplanet.com! news.gtei.net! newsfeed1.earthlink.net! 
nntp.earthlink.net! posted-from-earthlink! not-for-mail
>From: Edmond Wollmann <[email protected]>
>Newsgroups: alt.paranormal, alt.astrology, alt.usenet.kooks, 
alt.online-service.pacbell, news.admin.net-abuse.usenet, 
demon.local
>Subject: Re: EVERY SINGLE POST WILL GO TO NANAU Re: NOMINATION: 
Edmond Wollmann for Kook of the Year (was Re: Does sherilyn 
suffer from transvestitic fetishism diagnoses disorder? (was Re: 
Who's CHARTER is correct? What is "spam"?))
>Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 19:47:45 -0800
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>References: <[email protected]> 
<[email protected]> 
<[email protected]> 
<[email protected]> 
<[email protected]> 
<[email protected]> 
<[email protected]> 
<[email protected]> <[email protected]> 
<[email protected]> <366ac8c5.159186658@localhost> 
<[email protected]> <[email protected]> 
<[email protected]> <[email protected]> 
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
>X-Posted-Path-Was: not-for-mail
>CC: [email protected]
>Followup-To: alt.dev.null
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>X-ELN-Date: 19 Nov 1998 03:47:50 GMT
>X-ELN-Insert-Date: Wed Nov 18 19:55:30 1998
>Organization: Astrological Consulting/Altair Publications SAN 
299-5603
>Lines: 65
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>NNTP-Posting-Host: pool049-max1.ds6-ca-us.dialup.earthlink.net
>Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0C-NSCP (Win95; U)
>
>Path:
>
>nntp.earthlink.net! newsfeed1.earthlink.net! 
newshub.northeast.verio.net! news-
feeds.jump.net!solomon.io.com!hiram.io.com!not-for-mail
> From:
> [email protected] (Patrick L. Humphrey)
> Newsgroups:
> alt.paranormal, alt.astrology, alt.usenet.kooks
> Subject:
> Re: EVERY SINGLE POST WILL GO TO NANAU Re: NOMINATION:
>Edmond Wollmann for Kook of the Year (was Re: Does
> sherilyn suffer from transvestitic fetishism diagnoses
>disorder? (was Re: Who's CHARTER is correct? What is "spam"?))
> Date:
> 18 Nov 1998 21:08:06 -0600
> Organization:
> Illuminati Online
> Lines:
> 9
> Message-ID:
> <[email protected]>
> References:
> <[email protected]>
><[email protected]> 
<[email protected]>
> <[email protected]>
><[email protected]> 
<[email protected]>
> <[email protected]>
><[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> <[email protected]>
><366ac8c5.159186658@localhost> <[email protected]>
> <[email protected]>
><[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> <[email protected]>
> NNTP-Posting-Host:
> dillinger.io.com
> X-Trace:
> hiram.io.com 911444878 23096 199.170.88.11 (19 Nov
>1998 03:07:58 GMT)
> X-Complaints-To:
> [email protected]
>NNTP-Posting-Date:
> 19 Nov 1998 03:07:58 GMT
> X-Newsreader:
> Gnus v5.5/Emacs 20.2
> Xref:
> nntp.earthlink.net alt.paranormal:119557
>alt.astrology:202918 alt.usenet.kooks:111651
>
>Patrick L. Humphrey wrote:
>>
>> Edmond Wollmann <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>> [zap! Edie _still_ thinks PacBell listen to him, despite 
voluminous evidence
>> that they're laughing at him as much as most of the rest of 
those of us who
>> have dealt with him]
>>
>> Looks like -this- one ain't headed toward n.a.n-a.u, EdHole...
>>
>> --PLH, Wollmann for KotY? Sounds good to me!
>
>--
>Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
>© 1998 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
>Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
>Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
>SDSU http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/~wollmann/
>
------end sample article------

<[email protected]> alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
demon.local
alt.astrology
alt.usenet.kooks
<[email protected]> alt.astrology
alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
demon.local
<[email protected]> alt.astrology
alt.usenet.kooks
alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
demon.local
<[email protected]> alt.astrology
alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
demon.local
alt.paranormal
<[email protected]> alt.astrology
alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
demon.local
<[email protected]> alt.astrology
alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
demon.local
<[email protected]> alt.astrology
alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
demon.local
<[email protected]> alt.astrology
alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
<[email protected]> alt.astrology
alt.paranormal
alt.spirituality.circle
alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
talk.religion.newage
<[email protected]> alt.astrology
alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
alt.paranormal
talk.religion.newage
alt.spirituality.circle
<[email protected]> alt.astrology
alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
alt.paranormal
<[email protected]> alt.astrology
alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
demon.local
<[email protected]> alt.usenet.kooks
alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
demon.local
<[email protected]> alt.astrology
alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
demon.local
<[email protected]> alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
demon.local
alt.usenet.kooks
alt.astrology
<[email protected]> alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
demon.local
alt.astrology
alt.usenet.kooks
sci.skeptic
<[email protected]> alt.astrology
alt.usenet.kooks
alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
demon.local
<[email protected]> alt.astrology
alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
demon.local
<[email protected]> alt.astrology
alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
demon.local
<[email protected]> alt.paranormal
alt.astrology
alt.usenet.kooks
alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
demon.local

--
All postings to news.admin.net-abuse.bulletins are unconfirmed 
and
unverified unless stated otherwise by the moderators. All 
opinions
expressed above are considered the opinions of the original 
poster,
not the moderators or their respective employers.

For a copy of the guidelines to this group, see:
http://www.uiuc.edu/ph/www/tskirvin/nana/

Back to top
From: Andrew Gierth <[email protected]>
Subject: EMP Cancelled: [email protected]: BI = 20.08
Date: 20 Nov 1998 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Approved: [email protected]
X-Mayan-Date: Long count = 12.19.5.12.13; tzolkin = 5 Ben; haab 
= 6 Ceh
Followup-To: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
Organization: disorganised
X-Attribution: AG
X-Pgp-0x0E9FFBE9: 87 25 7F 14 41 24 B3 51 E0 19 8B DE 49 74 0C 29
X-P-Persistent-Headers: are a bad idea.
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.bulletins, news.admin.net-
abuse.usenet, alt.astrology

Ongoing followup-spamming from Wollman. These articles all 
consist of
a quote of an existing article with the same fixed content added 
each
time. See the Spam Thresholds FAQ.

9 articles were cancelled in 8 groups. The Breidbart Index was 
20.08.
The cumulative Briedbart Index including previous reports is 
62.79.

-----begin sample article-----
>Path: ...! news.maxwell.syr.edu! news1.best.com! 
newshub.sdsu.edu!not-for-mail
>From: EWollmann <[email protected]>
>Newsgroups: alt.astrology ,sci.skeptic, alt.online-
service.pacbell, news.admin.net-abuse.usenet, demon.local
>Subject: Re: Goodbye, farewell, amen.
>Followup-To: alt.dev.null
>Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 21:32:01 -0800
>Organization: Astrological Consulting/Altair Publications SAN 
299-5603
>Lines: 24
>Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>References: <[email protected]> 
<[email protected]> <[email protected]> 
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>NNTP-Posting-Host: 130.191.9.16
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>X-Server-Date: 19 Nov 1998 05:31:58 GMT
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0C-NSCP (Win95; U)
>
>Rick wrote:
>>
>> In article <[email protected]>,
>> Edmond Wollmann <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >The spinics set the standard. Talk to them.
>>
>> We make you do it? When are you going to learn to take
>> responsibility for your own actions like an adult?
>>
>> >I will be more than glad to
>> >discuss astrology and metaphysics only and to stay 
completely out of
>> >other groups unrelated -as I have for three years.
>>
>> You've preached your brand of astro-fraud and tried to scare 
off
>> your critics. You haven't discussed anything. You are greatly 
lacking
>> in integrity.
>
>--
>Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A.
>© 1998 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
>Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
>Artworks http://www.astroconsulting.com/personal/
>SDSU http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/~wollmann/
------end sample article------

<[email protected]> alt.paranormal
alt.astrology
alt.usenet.kooks
alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
demon.local
<[email protected]> alt.astrology
alt.usenet.kooks
alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
demon.local
<[email protected]> alt.astrology
alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
demon.local
<[email protected]> alt.astrology
alt.usenet.kooks
alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
demon.local
<[email protected]> alt.astrology
alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
demon.local
<[email protected]> alt.astrology
alt.usenet.kooks
alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
demon.local
<[email protected]> alt.astrology
alt.paranormal
alt.usenet.kooks
alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
demon.local
<[email protected]> alt.astrology
sci.skeptic
alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
demon.local
<[email protected]> alt.astrology
alt.usenet.kooks
alt.online-service.pacbell
news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
demon.local

--
All postings to news.admin.net-abuse.bulletins are unconfirmed 
and
unverified unless stated otherwise by the moderators. All 
opinions
expressed above are considered the opinions of the original 
poster,
not the moderators or their respective employers.

For a copy of the guidelines to this group, see:
http://www.uiuc.edu/ph/www/tskirvin/nana/

Back to top
From: [email protected] (EWollmann)
Subject: Re: LUNAR ECLIPSE CRASH ALERT
Date: 22 Sep 1997 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
SnewsLanguage: English
X-Admin: [email protected]
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
Newsgroups: alt.astrology

>From: Jim Rogers <jfr@fc/remove/.hp.com>
>Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 09:46:22 -0600
>Message-id: <[email protected]>
>
>

SNIP!
****** ANSWERS ******

1) For what sort of discussions is alt.astrology intended?

Answer: Alt.astrology is intended as a forum for astrologers of
all levels of expertise, from beginners to advanced, to discuss
astrological topics.

Alt.astrology is *not* intended as a forum for disbelievers to
voice their contempt for astrologers or to harass astrologers
about their belief in astrology and demand of them scientific
proof. Groups discussing the scientific validity of theories are
prefixed with "sci." If you wish to discuss the validity of
astrology as a discipline (as opposed to the validity of specific
theoretical statements within the domain of astrology), the
appropriate group on which to post is sci.skeptic. Here is the
statement of purpose for that group:

"Sci.skeptic is for those who are skeptical about claims of
the paranormal to meet with those who believe in the paranormal.
In this way the paranormalists can expose their ideas to
scientific scrutiny, and if there is anything in these ideas
then the skeptics might learn something."

Sci.skeptic often contains long discussions of scientific
evidence for and against specific astrological hypotheses, and
such discussion is welcome in that group. Further, many members
of that group are qualified to evaluate scientific evidence. The
astrologers in this group who enjoy participating in such
discussion with skeptics read and post to sci.skeptic.

http://www.magitech.com/pub/astrology/info/faq.txt
Edmond H. Wollmann
http://home.aol.com/ewollmann

Back to top
From: [email protected] (EWollmann)
Subject: Re: A question for the cynical
Date: 09 Sep 1997 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
SnewsLanguage: English
X-Admin: [email protected]
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
Newsgroups: alt.astrology

>Subject: Re: A question for the cynical
>From: [email protected] (Paul Schlyter)
>Date: 8 Sep 1997 08:11:10 +0200
>Message-id: <[email protected]>
>
>

SNIP!
Acceptable Use Policy states;
Abuse=
2.9. Posting articles to any USENET or other newsgroup, mailing
list or similar forum which are off-topic according to the 
charter or
other public statement of the forum.
^^^^^

****** ANSWERS ******

1) For what sort of discussions is alt.astrology intended?

Answer: Alt.astrology is intended as a forum for astrologers of
all levels of expertise, from beginners to advanced, to discuss
astrological topics.

Alt.astrology is *not* intended as a forum for disbelievers to
voice their contempt for astrologers or to harass astrologers
about their belief in astrology and demand of them scientific
proof. Groups discussing the scientific validity of theories are
prefixed with "sci." If you wish to discuss the validity of
astrology as a discipline (as opposed to the validity of specific
theoretical statements within the domain of astrology), the
appropriate group on which to post is sci.skeptic. Here is the
statement of purpose for that group:

"Sci.skeptic is for those who are skeptical about claims of
the paranormal to meet with those who believe in the paranormal.
In this way the paranormalists can expose their ideas to
scientific scrutiny, and if there is anything in these ideas
then the skeptics might learn something."

Sci.skeptic often contains long discussions of scientific
evidence for and against specific astrological hypotheses, and
such discussion is welcome in that group. Further, many members
of that group are qualified to evaluate scientific evidence. The
astrologers in this group who enjoy participating in such
discussion with skeptics read and post to sci.skeptic.

http://www.magitech.com/pub/astrology/info/faq.txt

Edmond H. Wollmann
http://home.aol.com/ewollmann

Back to top
From: [email protected] (Archimeden)
Subject: What is alt.astrology for?
Date: 16 Jul 1998 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
Newsgroups: alt.astrology
X-Admin: [email protected]

SNIP!

****** ANSWERS ******

1) For what sort of discussions is alt.astrology intended?

Answer: Alt.astrology is intended as a forum for astrologers of
all levels of expertise, from beginners to advanced, to discuss
astrological topics.

Alt.astrology is *not* intended as a forum for disbelievers to
voice their contempt for astrologers or to harass astrologers
about their belief in astrology and demand of them scientific
proof. Groups discussing the scientific validity of theories are
prefixed with "sci." If you wish to discuss the validity of
astrology as a discipline (as opposed to the validity of specific
theoretical statements within the domain of astrology), the
appropriate group on which to post is sci.skeptic. Here is the
statement of purpose for that group:

"Sci.skeptic is for those who are skeptical about claims of
the paranormal to meet with those who believe in the paranormal.
In this way the paranormalists can expose their ideas to
scientific scrutiny, and if there is anything in these ideas
then the skeptics might learn something."

Sci.skeptic often contains long discussions of scientific
evidence for and against specific astrological hypotheses, and
such discussion is welcome in that group. Further, many members
of that group are qualified to evaluate scientific evidence. The
astrologers in this group who enjoy participating in such
discussion with skeptics read and post to sci.skeptic.

archimeden

Back to top
From: [email protected] (Archimeden)
Subject: Re: YAAAS (Yet Another alt.astrology spammer)
Date: 20 Sep 1997 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
X-Admin: [email protected]
SnewsLanguage: English
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
Newsgroups: sci.skeptic

****** ANSWERS ******

1) For what sort of discussions is alt.astrology intended?

Answer: Alt.astrology is intended as a forum for astrologers of
all levels of expertise, from beginners to advanced, to discuss
astrological topics.

Alt.astrology is *not* intended as a forum for disbelievers to
voice their contempt for astrologers or to harass astrologers
about their belief in astrology and demand of them scientific
proof. Groups discussing the scientific validity of theories are
prefixed with "sci." If you wish to discuss the validity of
astrology as a discipline (as opposed to the validity of specific
theoretical statements within the domain of astrology), the
appropriate group on which to post is sci.skeptic. Here is the
statement of purpose for that group:

"Sci.skeptic is for those who are skeptical about claims of
the paranormal to meet with those who believe in the paranormal.
In this way the paranormalists can expose their ideas to
scientific scrutiny, and if there is anything in these ideas
then the skeptics might learn something."

Sci.skeptic often contains long discussions of scientific
evidence for and against specific astrological hypotheses, and
such discussion is welcome in that group. Further, many members
of that group are qualified to evaluate scientific evidence. The
astrologers in this group who enjoy participating in such
discussion with skeptics read and post to sci.skeptic.

http://www.magitech.com/pub/astrology/info/faq.txt

Back to top

http://www.smbtech.com/ed/edspams.html