Re: Anybody heard from that obnoxious jerk Eddie Wollmann?
Transsaction <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.astrology,alt.astrology.metapsych,alt.fatty-fuckers |
|---|---|
| Organization | None |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/24/2020 2:07 PM, carter wrote: > Edmond Wollmann's Reputation Profile > > Criminal or Civil Court records found on Edmond's Background Report > Lawsuits, Liens or Bankruptcies found on Edmond's Background Report > Criminal or Civil Court records found on Edmond's Family, Friends, > Neighbors, or Classmates > > "Summary: This report is fraudulent. I have no court records other than > the lawsuit I won for hundreds of thousands of dollars. The websites this > fraudulent company lists as mine are fake. my website is > http://home.earthlink.net/~arcturianone/ Edmond Wollmann is 63 years old > and was born on 5/12/1955. Currently, he lives in Veguita, NM, and San > Diego, CA. Edmond's education includes 3 university degrees and attending > los lunas high school. His ethnicity is Caucasian, whose political > affiliation is currently a registered Independent; and religious views are > listed as Other. Edmond is now single, and also has 1 children. He has a > reported annual income of $50,000 - $59,999 and a current net worth value > of greater than $1m. Read Full Summary" > > https://www.mylife.com/edmond-wollmann/e378093728250 > > http://www.smbtech.com/ed/ > > Information About Edmond H. Wollmann's > Abuse of the ISP Complaints Process > Update 7/30/99: > In an email to the owner of this server, Edmond threatened, > "Remove your defamation or I'll walk down there and yank it off" > > See the archive of Ed Wollmann's threats to and harrassment of this site's > owner. > > Who is the target audience for this web page? > > Although anyone is welcome to read it, this page was written to serve as a > resource for ISP abuse admins. > Who wrote this web page? > > The authors of this page are a group of Usenet readers and admins who > detest Usenet spamming, EMP, email abuse, and other forms of net abuse. If > you are investigating a true spammer or abuser, we sincerely hope that > your investigation serves justice. However, you were likely referred to > this page because actual net abuse may not have been done by your user. > Rather, the claim of abuse has been made by a person well known for > flooding abuse admins with spurious complaints. > Who is Edmond Wollmann? > > Mr. Wollmann is a well-known abuser of the ISP abuse process. He harasses > many people whom he encounters in Usenet by sending numerous complaints to > his targets' ISPs. Frequently he involves the ISPs' upstream providers > and news peers as well. > Why a web page about Mr. Wollmann was needed > > Which newsgroups are most affected by Mr. Wollmann's complaint letters? > > We know to date that Mr. Wollmann is sending complaints about many regular > posters in alt.astrology, alt.astrology.metapsych, alt.usenet.kooks, and > news.admin.net-abuse.usenet. However, Mr. Wollmann will often check on an > authors posting history, and bombard his victims' "home" newsgroup with > forwaded and off-topic posts in an attempt to intimidate a poster to stop > posting to "Ed's" group(s). > Who has had complaints sent about them by Mr. Wollmann? > > We do not know for sure how many people have had this happen to them. For > one thing, if an ISP (wisely in our opinion) chooses to ignore him, his > target is not always aware that Mr. Wollmann has been complaining about > him or her. However, there is more than enough information to show that > Mr. Wollmann is harassing quite a few people with the number and volume of > complaints that he sends. Documentation is available at this link: > Your customer is not alone: some of Wollmann's many targets > > > What do news and abuse admins say about Mr. Wollmann? > > Several abuse admins have been willing to "go public" with their > experiences with Edmond Wollmann. They rightfully grow tired of his > spurious complaints and address morphing to thwart their mailfilters. > "Mr. Wollmann seems sadly ignorant of the legal doctrine of "unclean > hands." Essentially what it means is that a court will not grant relief to > one who complains of being damaged if the complainant has himself engaged > in abuse related to the cause of action." -Jason Barr, PBI Policy Manager > > "Mr. Wollman's account at AzNET was cancelled due to multiple, seemingly > endless complaints about his abusive behavior in Usenet."- Jack Bailey, > Aznet > > "...Eddie first came to my attention: a complaint from columbia.edu about > the complaints they had been receiving from Eddie, as many as 300 per > day....His *thing* is abusing abuse departments. If he doesn't get his way > with complaints, he'll call up and harass the abuse department. If they > manage to avoid his calls (or direct him to cease and desist phoning), he > sends large numbers of duplicate complaints via email." Nick Nicholas, > Executive Director, Mail Abuse Prevention System LLC, mail-abuse.org > (formerly of pacbell.net) > > "You have a worthless charter given that you chose to made your group > [alt.astrology.metapsych] unmoderated. I think you set it up to attempt to > kill accounts and that it should be rmgrouped as a trap and public > nuisiance." -Rebecca Ore, respected n.a.n.a-u participant. > > More documentation is available at this link: > > Abuse admins re: Edmond Wollmann > > > And what has Mr. Wollmann said about admins and ISPs? > > Mr. Wollmann on the subject of ISPs and their employees > What has Mr. Wollmann done to lose credibility with many people? > > Mr. Wollmann has shown himself in many ways to be a poor Netizen and not > someone whose opinion can be trusted about the appropriateness of > another's postings. In addition, many of the actions which Mr. Wollmann > accuses others of in his complaints are actually things he has done > himself in Usenet. Documentation is available at the links below: > Mr. Wollmann Spams Usenet > Mr. Wollmann frequently sends complaints about others "spamming" even > when the posts being complained about do not fall under the Skirvin > guidelines. This is ironic, because Wollmann is well aware of what > constitutes spam. He was TOSsed from AOL and lost 6 accounts there for > spamming. Wollmann also has spammed from both Earthlink and ATT Worldnet, > documented by thoroughly detailed spam reports and multiple cancels of his > spam. > > Mr. Wollmann Censors by Illegitimately issuing Third-Party Cancels for > Others' Usenet posts > Mr. Wollmann has never owned up to his own censorious activities. In July > of 1997, he issued a rash of over 50 illegitimate third-party cancels for > Usenet posts with which he apparently had some issue with. Many of the > posts he attempted to cancel made it to DejaNews, so that it can be seen > that posters were sometimes merely criticising him. Wollman's outrageous > "Netcopping" behavior is grevious Net Abuse. > > He has publicly admitted to his intention to send thousands of complaints > Mr. Wollmann has announced in Usenet, many times, his intentions to send > volumionus complaints. > > He makes "off-topic" complaints about others while he frequently posts > off-topic > Mr. Wollmann likes to complain about other posters being "off-topic". He > does this in a hypervigilant manner and so disrupts normal Usenet > conversation. However, he often makes off-topic posts himself -- > especially when he discussed complaints he has sent. He often adds > unrelated newsgroups to his posts. He also often sets follow-ups to his > posts to go to alt.dev.null rather than to the groups where his messages > were posted. > > alt.astrology.metapsych: so many "off-topic" complaints that a new charter > was needed > Mr. Wollmann admitted to adding this group in his cross-posts in > particular--in order to entrap persons following up his posts so that he > could send "off-topic" complaints about them. He became such a nuisance > that a consensus was reached to create a new charter for this group which > would make it harder for him to send these complaints about posters being > off-topic there. > > > Mr. Wollmann himself frequently posts abusively in Usenet > Nobody involved with this site denies Mr. Wollmann's right to engage in > flame wars and be as insulting or as profane as he wants to be. There is a > difference, however, between abuse ON the Net and abuse OF the Net. Many > of Mr. Wollmann's complaints are about abusive and defaming posts even as > he insults, defames, and abuses other posters. He posts, without > permission, private e-mail sent to him. He has made threats regarding > posters' places of business, mailbombing threats, threats of telephone > harassment, threats to force his in-person presence upon other posters, > and at least one explicit threat to commit physical violence. > > What is Mr. Wollmann's email account address? > > Unfortunately, there is no simple answer to this question! Edmond > Wollmann abuses the Net in several ways, and as a result frequently loses > Internet accounts. Not only does he change address frequently, but also > often sends complaints from more than one address at a time -- which can > make it seem as though many people are complaining about an individual > when that is the fact not the case. Documentation is available at this > link: > Some of his current and past accounts & why he has lost many of these > accounts > > > > Mr. Wollmann, Award-Winning Netizen > > Mr. Wollmann actually won a Usenet award, titled "Kook of the Month", for > his Usenet posts of February, 1998. Click here to view some of the posts > he made at that time which earned him this distinction. > > Wollmann Usenet Post Archive 2/98 to 7/99 > > Download your own reference archive for Mr. Wollmann's Usenet posts for > the past 1.5 years (2mb .zip file expands to 7mb text file). > :-)