http://payhip.com/astrology has as many #zodiax as #1008planets

Unlocking the mysteries behind the zodiax you thought you knew. 
Kidding: of curse you didn’t. Neither Nostradamus did, but that 
does not make you an Astrologist: only one Hayagriva...Kalkii 
in a precession cycle is meii: Ver Neit Nubty.  

http://payhip.com/astrology has as many #zodiax as #1008planets 

Sri Hayagrivanantadevasesanagasankarsana uvaca. 

DEFAULT MIND

The circulation of events – if any – is often by far more 
complex than default mind – the simpletons agree-to-all (by 
default) “own mind”. Thus “people” tend to (at least 
temporarily) simplify stuff into the hands of politicians who 
typically have no idea what are they proposing to an even less 
informed crowd. Not being given to any serious study, they 
improvise towards any easily reachable (that is profitable) 
immediate purpose. You will e.g. notice a rabble of nincompoops 
agreeing on “climate change” (for lucrative purposes) in midst 
of snowy Davos.  

THE MIND OF THE WORLD

Default mind being the mind of the world: cannot possibly 
“think” (its own thoughts not being its own at all) or even 
copycat (xeroxing is what it only does best) change, 
precession, zodiacs. 



CHINESE SKIES

The Chinese shamagis seldom ever needed zodiax at all; partly 
because they knew their own stars all too well. Their 
predictions were thus extremely accurate even towards 
incomparable Kalki standards; e.g. as follows: “The king will 
hunt at 04:43, bagging two tigers, a tigress; seven deer 
(insert list here) 17 fowl (mainly pheasants): will make His 
own return at 21:45.” That, by the way: is a prediction: 
anything else is not even guesswork. 

ZODIAX

The first surprise is that there are as many zodiacs as 
planets, incipiently since no planet or satellite ever follows 
the ecliptic of the Sun: not even the Sun does; really. Further 
surprises come as negations of afore hand presumed given 
truisms which are not: e.g. seldom any given civilization knew 
about zodiacs or gods-forbid: precessions of the ascendant 
sets: they normally never even knew what was rising at east 
(except from e.g. Egyptians who did observe horizon, whence the 
word “horoskopein” originated). In poor words: modern 
horrorscope is not. It surely does not observe any horizon, 
ascendant or god-forbid real sky: it is laid down for the naive 
(thus inane) nobody in order for him to learn nothing (but 
wrong stuff about nobody else).  





YOU DONT NAIVELY “HAVE” ONE ZODIACAL SIGN: 

you have them all – omniverse being packed with events in every 
constellation, sign and house all of the time: whether you 
notice or not, like a busy street: planets bypass, “collide” 
(sometimes for real) scurry within some Aussie horoscope that 
you can’t see. Speaking of Australia it would seem unbelievable 
that they “believe” (thus never learning from aborigines) that 
their skies resemble London fog: thus there is no zodiac in 
London and even the less in Sydney: but people like to be 
fooled by those even less intelligent (but crafty) than 
themselves.