How to get to know the REAL positions of your planets? http://payhip.com/astrology #RTRRT

Academic Zodiac <[email protected]> Tue, 8 Mar 2022 12:25:22 -0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups alt.astrology.pro
Organization RTRRT Academic Zodiac
Message-ID <[email protected]>
How to get to know the REAL positions of your planets? 
http://payhip.com/astrology #RTRRT

a)Normally an “astrologer” would never use an astronomic program since 
modern astrology must differ from the real skies by 270 or at least 90 
degrees in order to appear credible to general public as begging to be 
deceived day by day, alright. 
b)How to get to know the REAL positions of your (natal) planets? Yes, 
even with that awkward pseudo-programs of yours in which you used to 
believe so much? 
c)Yes, hate it as you might, but NASA is in fact lurking at you from 
every bogus (but colorful as any lie) program you might peruse (that 
might peruse you) along your wretched quest for binary solutions: am I 
sidereal, tropical or true?
d)Most "modern” programs came as derivate of an old Placalc Astrolog 
experiment.
e)Astrolog has a DOS switch - a planetarium-like feature delving deep 
enough into NASA integrator at the base of every program which enables 
graphical view of planetary positions e.g. the Academic Zodiac was born 
with Moon in Sextans.  
f)Bogus programs are namely of course NASA-based before all planetary 
positions get mangled for profit. They alas mangle even telescopes for 
profit nowadays. 
g)How did them astrologers in the past calculate planetary positions? 
First: there were no astrologers – mostly – except for e.g. Egypt and 
China - second: they were astronomers and seers like Prahlada Maharaj: 
who traveled planets rather than merely observing them. The Chinese 
predictions were so accurate that even Kalki compliments them in all. 
h)Thus even with Nechepso and Petosiris under our most closely severe 
inspection, whatever remains of recorded data of pertinent neigh 
incomparably relevant precision is but Chinese (even much before Shao 
Yung); while e.g. that Enoch was reportedly  unqualified in all. 
i)Hipparchus, Ptolemy, Hypatia or dabbling amateurs like Newton, 
Nostradamus or even that Kepler receive no mention while that French 
Lully never learned from Morinus: on the other hand Robson apparently 
learned how to work with error.
j)Appleby “emerged a worried astrologer”: true is that all of them never 
had –  not being offered - any clue; apart from some meager - mostly 
dabbling – literary talent.
k)As concern Australia, which shares astrological nullity with the rest 
of the Commonwealth, its problems should encompass a different sky from 
that on the northern hemisphere entirely; instead since the UK never had 
any astrology proper at all, Aussie whacked geniuses follow suit: one 
especially talented nincompoop determined in his own Aussie madness that 
“USA is Polar Star ascendant” and  Aussies #QuarterSky clapped hands in 
joy along, far from Serpens Cauda dire. 
l)Of contemporary talents we would set apart (Saturn Pleiades 1588) Dr. 
John Dee, who was baffled as deceived by NE90SO nevertheless; that he 
called “angels”. 

-- 
ReadingAstro|:|||:Tarot http://paypal.me/16suns/11
@2016shift [email protected] INSTANT MAGICK #RTRRT coaching.
REAL SKY PDF horoscopes 1008 answers