Re: UPDATE ON AMERICAN DISRESPECT BEGETS DISRESPECT

dolf <[email protected]>
Newsgroups alt.philosophy.taoism,soc.culture.jewish,alt.astrology,alt.astrology.metapsych,sci.electronics.design
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 20/6/2023 01:34, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 4:06:51 PM UTC-7, Edmond H. Wollmann wrote:
>> On 18 Jun 2023, dolf <[email protected]> posted some
>> news:[email protected]:
>>
>>> RHUBARB @ 0121 HRS ON 19 JUNE 2023: "Critique: "Some Republicans
>>> learned to 'name-drop' Derrida as an intellectual fashion for elites,
>>> and you can 'turn it back on them' using his work. This one continues
>>> with the 'dunce' shit: really, 'auto-affection' is a modern idea Greek
>>> theories of the soul did not have in its complete form."
>>>
>>> DOLF @ 0343 HRS ON 19 JUNE 2023: "Clearly you haven't read and
>>> understood the metalogic conundrum that was placed before you
>>> irrespective of whether metaphysics is an accepted science or not.
>> I'm the only one qualified to lecture on anything meta around here.
> 
> "Are you currently doing psychiatric consultation about your behavior, then?"

I did convey that a historical dependence upon the LUOSHU reference 
object introduces an anthropological idealism associative to the META 
LOGIC FALLACY within its #38 - JUPITER PRINCIPLE as aesthetic (ie. the 
hypotenuse thesis) which is made against #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (#41 
+ #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY) being a methodology of #491 - AGENCY 
that we redacted two policing #237 - USE OF FORCE scenarios (not 
included here) as CASE STUDIES to their metaphysical constructs relative 
to the DOMINION ARRAY in the context of the COMMONWEALTH being a 
CAESAROPAPISM and DEFENDER [#44, #17, #38]@(#123 / #99 -- to deploy the 
DOMINION array anchors as a TRIPARTITE intellectual construct against 
the ontic substitution premise within the machinery as BIPARTITE 
sovereign / autonomy dynamic) OF THE FAITH: DIEU ET MON DROIT conforming 
to a SUPERORDINATE TRIPARTITE NUMBER CONSTRUCT.

The #237 - USE OF FORCE is a conceptual form presently deployed by our 
state police whose motto is TENEZ LE DROIT / UPHOLD THE RIGHT that is 
also an ontic / deme boundary and a general principle of #491 - AGENCY 
(ie. no less applicable to healthcare) capacity in conformity to #40 - 
LAW / MODEL (FE) as then a functional #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST which 
is distinct to the #111 - FALLACIOUS OR VACUOUS assertion that attaining 
#71 - *DOMINION* [#38 - FULLNESS (SHENG), #33 - CLOSENESS (MI)] is 
judgement sensibility's ultimate end as it's centre of value.

#71 as [#1, #30, #10, #30] /
#73 as [#6, #1, #30, #6, #30] /
#81 as [#1, #30, #10, #30, #10] /
#111 as [#1, #30, #10, #30, #600] /
#123 as [#2, #1, #30, #10, #30, #10, #600] = ʼĕlîyl (H457): {UMBRA: #71 
% #41 = #30} 1) of nought, *GOOD* *FOR* *NOTHING*, worthless; 1a) *OF* 
*PHYSICIANS*, a shepherd, *A* *DIVINATION*; 1b) of false gods;

Which is also a requisite for GNOSIS EX MACHINA being a nomenclature 
provision of acceptable meta descriptors for articulating the viable 
boundary (ie. SUGGESTED BY THE EXPRESSION nán táo fǎ wǎng (難逃法網): [#79 - 
𝍔難 = #530 / #49 - 𝌶逃 = #500 / #40 - 𝌭法 = #491] - IT IS HARD TO ESCAPE 
THE DRAGNET OF THE LAW; THE LONG ARM OF THE LAW) of consciousness 
instantiation, having a correspondence to the cosmological primitives 
(ie. LAWS OF NATURE: fǎ dù (法度):  [#40 - 𝌭法 = #491 / #52 - 𝌹度 = #503] 
- (A) LAW / chéng wén fǎ (成文法):  [#73 - 𝍎成 = #524 / #47 - 𝌴文 = #498 / 
#40 - 𝌭法 = #491] - STATUTE) published within the CANON OF SUPREME 
MYSTERY (太玄經) TETRADS of 4 BCE.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/IBAC%20Notes%2020230613.pdf>
-- 
Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable / 
resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third 
party d3 library.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.