REPOST: Disclosure (Elements *as* Space and Time)
Alain Stalder <[email protected]> Wed, 27 Dec 2023 02:13:27 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | alt.astrology |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This was my most important post ever, my best idea, the basis of my website exactphilosophy.net since relatively shortly after that... https://www.exactphilosophy.net Let this be my last Usenet post ever... (Never say never, but this would be my wish at the moment...) -- Subject: Disclosure Date: Thu 20 May 2004 02:24:44 CEST Newsgroups: alt.astrology.tropical From: Hermes <hermes at exactphilosophy.net> Message-ID: <hermes-D2B436.23443619052004 at news.bluewin.ch> In condensed form: me, see: space, in/out pictures change: time, rest/move fire:=out+move, earth:=out+rest, air:=in+rest, water:=in+move want, pictures change differently: 5th element Long version: Let me start with a similar text that I wrote in 1993, which was actually at the root of my journey into philosophy, psychology, astrology, etc. me, conscious see changes: time more than one thing, something else than me: space want: pictures change Kant discovered (or argued, if you prefer) that space and time are the most fundamental things, the only things that exist "a priori". Both are necessary for thinking. The idea is to imagine that one opens one's eyes for the first time and sees... One thing that one notices, is that what one sees changes. That is time. In addition, there is more than one thing that can be seen, and there is the conscious "I" that observes and the pictures that are seen. That is space (anything that separates two "things"). Without space and time, thinking is not possible. Finally, one notices also that, depending on how one wants what one sees to change, things will change differently (Schopenhauer), although not necessarily in the way one would like to. That is (free) will. Now, that was where I was standing in 1993, simply putting what Kant and Schopenhauer had discovered about 200 years earlier into condensed form. More than 10 years later, last Wednesday (2004-05-18) the situation was a bit different: Saturn is in Cancer and Chiron in Capricorn, which has, in my observation, the effect that one is forced to reduce the "home" zone, to retract a bit to an inner core and start to grow new things, especially relations, gently from there, while avoiding some of the old relations because they needed to be removed (Chiron's healing). Luckily, Jupiter in Virgo is helpful for growing new structures, even repeatedly. Brief, I managed to connect a few things that I learned in the meantime in a potentially very promising way. Aristotle had the four elements composed of dry/wet and hot/cold. During my newsgroup posts, I discovered a few different ways of looking at this composition. One of them is that in/out can be identified with wet/dry. Many things, especially organic ones, are wetter inside than outside. What is measured in science, is what can be seen and touched (fire and earth), while quantum mechanics uses logic (air) to describe what happens in the world by a wave function (water). If you link that to the fundamental link between space and subject/object or in/out, you have linked one of the two opposites that define the four elements directly to space and thus to a primary necessity for thinking. Now, with that working, I tried to get time in, in the same way. Hot/cold does not do, but recently, I had discovered here (also with some help by DJ) that the opposite rest/move can also be used to describe one of the two necessary pairs of opposites to describe the four elements. Fire moves up, air rests (actively), water flows down, earth rests again. So the observation that some things that one sees move, is nothing else than the discovery of the opposite rest/move, which is practically equivalent to the discovery that there is time, the other thing that is fundamentally needed for thinking. So, to get things across as clearly as possible: From the basic experiences in/out and rest/move, one gets space and time and can *define* the four elements: fire:=out+move, earth:=out+rest, air:=in+rest, water:=in+move Now, where's the clue? Well, that was already the clue. It is an almost formal reasoning that leads to the existence of four elements. In other words, if the reasoning is correct, then the fact that there are the four elements, in the way that Aristotle and others postulated them, is not just a cultural thing, but a property of *nature*, i.e. it is physics, not "just" philosophy, psychology, astrology. Of course, a lot will depend on whether that concept can actually grow, whether it will be possible to derive more of the properties of the four elements and maybe even star signs, or the I Ching, etc. and, of course, link that to quantitative experiments. For the moment, at least the 5th element fits nicely: The observation that, depending on how one wants what one sees to change, things change differently, defines (free) will, a concept separate of the four elements that can be called/defined "5th element". Again, the approach is different, a concept that is common in astrology or maybe also psychology, has been defined as something quite fundamental and necessary for thinking and living. Finally, note that Neptune is transiting in opposition to my sun, so maybe things will stay at that and the rest will remain an illusion, or do so for the moment.