Re: Dr. Carl Sagan on religion, science and other things.

jeff <[email protected]> wrote in news:101rbj3$5ud1$1
@paganini.bofh.team:

> On 04 Jun 2025, Dawn Flood <[email protected]> posted some 
> news:[email protected]:
> 
>> On 6/4/2025 12:32 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>> Dawn Flood <[email protected]> wrote in
>>> news:[email protected]:
>>> 
>>>  From the trial  transcript:
>>> Day 11 (October 18), PM Session, Part 1...
>>> 
>>> Q Under that same definition astrology
>>> is a scientific theory under your definition,
>>> correct?
>>> 
>>> A Under my definition, a scientific theory
>>> is a proposed explanation which focuses
>>> or points to physical, observable data and
>>> logical inferences. There are many things
>>> throughout the history of science
>>> which we now think to be incorrect which
>>> nonetheless would fit that -- which would
>>> fit that definition. Yes, astrology is in
>>> fact one, and so is the ether theory of the
>>> propagation of light, and many other --
>>> many other theories as well.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> Interesting!  This certainly explains a lot!!
> 
> Yes, he's a wackjob, Holman that is.
> 


    Since Andrew cannot defend his 
creationist story maybe you can?