Re: NASA fast-tracks nuclear-powered spaceship, aims for interplanetary travel
Jeremiah Jones <[email protected]> Sun, 19 Apr 2026 22:22:48 -0700
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy,rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,alt.economics,or.politics,seattle.politics |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
a425couple <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/17/26 13:03, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > > a425couple crossposted excessively across 6 newsgroups without Followup-To: > >> from > >> https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2026/apr/15/nasa-chief-isaacman-us-needs-nuclear-powered-interplanetary/?utm_source=newsshowcase&utm_medium=gnews&utm_campaign=CDAQxpSN9K3ezs0lGPH5yN31_5TIlwEqKggAIhBcERswRnPnLkaJ3_gLN8OaKhQICiIQXBEbMEZz5y5Gid_4CzfDmg&utm_content=rundown > >> > >> WATCH: NASA fast-tracks nuclear-powered spaceship, aims for > >> interplanetary travel in 2028 > > > > This has nothing to do with astronomy, therefore does not belong in > > alt.astronomy. > > > > I disagree with you. > This post about US's NASA launching from earth a spaceship carrying > a nuclear reactor to the moon, > is definitely related to astronomy. > Sending humans to the Moon, and/or Mars certainly contributes to > scientific study. > > AI Overview snip! It doesn't matter who disagrees with what. Anyone can post anything to any ng, and nobody's going to stop them. The pointy-eared Matriarch Of All Usenet may adjust its attitude accordingly, or cry all night. JJ Overview: Of course nuclear space ships are relevant to astronomy. And oregon & seattle too. Don't be stupid.