Re: Musk has lot of bold goals, but how many has he achieved?
"Jim Wilkins" <[email protected]> Sun, 14 Jun 2026 20:05:22 -0400
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy,rec.aviation.military,fl.politics,alt.economics |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Stephen Harding" wrote in message news:[email protected]... There is also the issue of scale. A person can be quite good at engineering and management in the initial stages of a technology development, but things get very much out of hand when the company is initially successful and then grows. ----------------------- That's the reason for Skunk Works, small select groups within a larger organization tasked with an often secret project and only loosely if at all supervised by management. I was read into them at both Segway and Mitre. The name arose at Lockheed for secret jet fighter projects, after Lockheed engineers had developed one on their own. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_L-133 based on early steam and then gas turbine R&D by Nathan Price. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_J37 British experimental electronic warfare development followed a similar pattern of very small groups, each member solely responsible for a bounded portion such as electrical, mechanical or optical. The leader made sure one member's output matched another's needed input. https://www.abebooks.com/9780698108967/Wizard-British-Scientific-Intelligence-1939-1945-0698108965/plp It's well written and not as technical as it could (should) have been. Mitre was created to address that problem for government communications etc projects, initially the DEW line, with a corporate culture that amounted to many small units dreaming up answers to assigned multidisciplinary problems with large national technical systems, like AWACS, GPS or the FAA's 1940's radio technology. Projects bog down when the indivisible portions become too complex for one engineer. IMHO that's more typical of extensive than intensive complexity. Two or more tend to champion different approaches unless the leader can clearly define the needs. This is an excellent description of the Tiger Team group dynamics and effective leadership style: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Soul_of_a_New_Machine When it came out I was on a similar team developing an LSI-11 based machine to test computer chips on the production line. Our leader was a brilliant Ph.D. with an easygoing (but very focused) beard and sandals hippie attitude and VW bus. When I mentioned I had made insulating polyester film inserts for my home windows he mentally calculated the radiative heat transfer through them.