Re: Musk has lot of bold goals, but how many has he achieved?
"Jim Wilkins" <[email protected]> Mon, 15 Jun 2026 09:09:11 -0400
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy,rec.aviation.military,fl.politics,alt.economics |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Jim Wilkins" wrote in message news:[email protected]... > ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_J37 "Steam generation at high altitudes required air to be pressurized to sea level pressure and delivered at a constant rate to a steam generator's burners; ..." River steamboat developer Oliver Evans had experimented with supercharging a steam engine firebox in the early 1800's but concluded it was far beyond available blacksmithing capability. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Evans In Evans' time the modern metal lathe capable of geometric precision had only recently been invented, previously metal was turned like wood with hand-guided chisels. Machine tools that accurately cut straight and flat surfaces were still a decade or more in the future. Iron couldn't yet be melted and was worked by heating it until soft and sticky enough to weld into larger forms by hammering pieces together (wrought), though with oxide and slag inclusions that randomly weakened it. That is the reason steam pressure was kept very low and engines very inefficient. The initial steam engines of the 1690's tended to explode so for safety only the vacuum from condensation was used for steam power for the next hundred years. Practical transportation required higher pressure and more efficient lighter engines. The ability to melt iron, separate the slag, control the carbon content and produce steel in industrial quantity was developed between the 1850's and 1880's. Then the older ideas became practical and technology leaped forward. Historically steel could only be produced in small quantities in covered crucibles. Steel is iron with around half to one percent by weight of carbon and as little sulfur or phosphorus as practical. Cast iron contains as much carbon from the fuel as the iron will dissolve, around 5~6%, which lowers the melting point enough for a low tech air blast to reach but makes it brittle. Wrought iron is nearly pure iron with the carbon burnt out or not added, by regulating the air intake. Nails which are easy for the factory to form and the user to bend are similar to wrought iron. This shows the danger of building large structures from cast and wrought iron: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tay_Bridge_disaster https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wootz_steel The European alternative "Damascus" of moderate carbon levels for hard plus tough weapons and springs was a mix of high and low carbon steels, produced by welding together alternating layers of both. This inventor was able to melt and cast it, in small quantities. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Huntsman Iron ore in Austria and Sweden was also pure enough to make good Roman and Viking swords similarly, but not larger items for which they used easier melting bronze. In many ways the tech of 1800 was little better than ancient Rome's. Water and sewer utilities were worse.