Re: Man Drops Dead - After Getting Vaxxed
Vincent Maycock <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.politics.radical-left,alt.abortion,alt.society.liberalism,alt.activism.death-penalty,alt.atheism |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 14:02:26 -0700, "Andrew" <[email protected]> wrote: >"Vincent Maycock" wrote in message news:[email protected]... >> "Andrew" wrote: >>>"Vincent Maycock" wrote: >>>> "Andrew" wrote: >>>>>"Dawn Flood" wrote: >>>>><> >>>>>> Why does it have to be some "ultra, super, high >>>>>> intelligence?" Why not just "intelligence"? >>>>>> >>>>>> Dawn >>>>> >>>>>Good question, Dawn! >>>>> >>>>>We know it is far more advanced than us >>>>>humans. >>>>> >>>>>"DNA is like a computer program but far, >>>>>far more advanced than any software ever >>>>>created." ~ Bill Gates >>>>> >>>>>Living things (that includes you and me) >>>>>would not exist without CODE [DNA]. >>>> >>>> Although it uses the genetic code, DNA >>>> is not the same thing as it. >>> >>>Yes. >>> >>>DNA is a molecule created for the purpose of >>>carrying information. This information is in >>>the format of a quaternary digital code. >> >> it; DNA uses four >> nucleotides (A,T,G, and C), so it's "quaternary," and "digital" >> because the nucleotides are discrete rather than run together. >> Certainly there's nothing that would require a super-calculating >> super-intellect to create it. > >Which is like saying, We're talking about the genetic code right now, of course. That means, not the genome and not the rest of the DNA machinery. > "There's nothing fantastically complex >about" the ~alphabet~ we use. Right. There isn't. >But by using this simple alphabet we can write a vast amount >of books to fill libraries. Yeah, evolution is what fills those libraries of the biological world using the genetic code. Proteins are in that sense "discovered" by the genetic code -- the same way words are "discovered" by the alphabet. >The books that were written using this alphabet, were written >by sentient beings who used their_*intelligence*_ to do so. Natural selection can lead to functionality in living things as well as or better than "intelligence" per se. >Hope this helps. I don't need any help from you. I guess it's the thought that counts, though, right?