Re: In the atheist bible, is homosexuality condemned?
Brock McNuggets <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism,alt.religion.scientology,comp.os.linux.advocacy,talk.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Organization | Southern Nevada Institute of Technology |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Aug 1, 2026 at 5:08:31 PM MST, "pothead" wrote <[email protected]>: > On 2026-07-31, Attila <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 31 Jul 2026 08:35:38 GMT, Brock McNuggets >> <[email protected]> in alt.atheism with message-id >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Jul 31, 2026 at 1:29:32?AM MST, "Attila" wrote >>> <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> On Thu, 30 Jul 2026 21:02:51 -0400, "Joel W. Crump" >>>> <[email protected]> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 7/30/2026 7:42 PM, Attila wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 30 Jul 2026 15:01:29 -0400, "Joel W. Crump" >>>>>> <[email protected]> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> On 7/30/2026 2:41 PM, Attila wrote: >>>>>>>> On 30 Jul 2026 15:18:19 GMT, Brock McNuggets >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We are more >>>>>>>>> likely to face another pandemic. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Or not. Stop funding research in China. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rand Paul is a kook, Trump is just lying publicly and you take it >>>>>>> seriously. COVID was an act of God >>>>>> >>>>>> I have yet to see any valid evidence supporting the >>>>>> existence of any god. >>>>>> >>>>>> - make no mistake. He put it in >>>>>>> Wuhan because of the ambiguity of how it might have reached humans. But >>>>>>> it was not China's fault *in any respect*. >>>>>> >>>>>> It was all China's fault. They lied from the beginning. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If COVID did not leak out of the lab, there was nothing to lie about. >>>>> You are buying into Rand Paul's unmedicated dementia. I promise you, >>>>> there will be no great revealing of the lab being the cause, because if >>>>> you really knew anything you'd know that it'd already be an established >>>>> fact, if it were the case. It is not the case. >>>> >>>> It must have been China. Sufficient evidence is that you >>>> say it wasn't. >>> >>> You say it must have been. If so then surely you have evidence. More than >>> that, surely you will publish a paper with your proof. >> >> I gave sufficient proof. You said it wasn't That is all I >> need. > > https://youtu.be/lR1Lu48EdpU?si=OXn1SjjDE_vUyZN1&t=131 Do you have a reputable source? -- It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.