Re: Fauci pleads the 5th.
Rudy Canoza <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Aug 2026 10:38:34 -0700
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.society.liberalism,alt.atheism,alt.fun,alt.politics.democrats.d,talk.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Organization | Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com |
| Message-ID | <um4cS.3390$G%[email protected]> |
On 8/3/2026 9:21 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies: > In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] > says... >> >> Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in >> news:[email protected]: >> >>> In article <[email protected]>, >>> [email protected] says... >>>> >>>> Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in >>>> news:[email protected]: >>>> >>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2026-07-31 08:50, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>> [email protected] says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> NoBody <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 29 Jul 2026 12:51:44 -0600, Skeeter <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-07-29 18:04:42 +0000, Mitchell Holman said: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wonder why. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because he's guilty. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He is not entitled to the 5th. He was pardoned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What crime are they investigating? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And since he testified before Congress >>>>>>>>>>>>>> just 2 years ago why are we doing this again? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice try but you know. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Actually that was a good question. >>>>>>>>>>>> Fauci was grilled at length by Congress >>>>>>>>>>>> just two years ago, what has he done since >>>>>>>>>>>> then to merit another witch hunt? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why did he claim the 5th 111 times? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Silly boy, he is just following Trumps lead. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Trump pleaded the fifth more than 400 times >>>>>>>>>>>> in fraud deposition, video shows >>>>>>>>>>>> Jan 31 2023 >>>>>>>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/3xty43c3 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If Rand "Hell Toupee" Paul was sincerly interested in >>>>>>>>>>> hearing real answers from Fauci he could've granted him >>>>>>>>>>> immunity from further legal prosecution. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You hope that the criminals one your side get that huh? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> During the July 29, 2026, Senate Homeland Security and >>>>>>>>>> Governmental Affairs Committee hearing, Dr. Anthony Fauci >>>>>>>>>> declined to answer questions more than 100 times (with some >>>>>>>>>> early reports indicating over 70 to 111 times) by invoking >>>>>>>>>> his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And this is despite a pardon which requires him to not invoke >>>>>>>>> the 5th on these matters. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If he has a pardon and a PRESIDENTIAL >>>>>>>> MEDAL OF FREEDOM and a commendation by >>>>>>>> Trump why is the GOP Congress suddenly >>>>>>>> grilling him? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Because he lied. >>>>>> >>>>>> Quote a single lie he told. >>>>>> >>>>>> Note: >>>>>> >>>>>> Writing one diary entry expressing the best available explanation >>>>>> at the time... >>>>>> >>>>>> ...and then writing another that contradicts it when new >>>>>> information is available? >>>>>> >>>>>> That's not a lie. >>>>> >>>>> You just want to argue. We have the diary. >>>> >>>> >>>> What crime does the diary prove he committed? >>> >>> Gain of function and lies he told and admission to making money from >>> the Covid. >> >> What "lies"? >> >> What money did he "make from Covid"? > > Read the diary. You read it. We — yes, there *IS* "we" — know you haven't. You've only listened to Republiscum/QAnon lies about it.