Re: Capital One proves Trumpstein and his failsons are money-laundering crooks

In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
> 
> Capital One bank has asked a federal judge to dismiss a lawsuit from the Trump 
> Organization over the closure of hundreds of bank accounts back in 2021, arguing 
> in new papers that the shutdowns were the product of a monthslong 
> anti-money-laundering review ? not retaliation for the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, as 
> the Trump family businesses have claimed.
> 
> In a motion to dismiss the case filed Friday in a Florida federal court, Capital 
> One's lawyers wrote that the bank's own filings and the Trump businesses' 
> allegations "make clear that Capital One closed Plaintiffs' accounts for 
> anti-money laundering ('AML') reasons."
> 
> The bank said the decision followed "months of analysis and a careful review" by 
> its financial-crimes team, which it said was staffed by employees with "decades 
> of law enforcement experience." But the filings suggest the Trump Organization 
> and affiliated entities were given no opportunity to address any 
> money-laundering or compliance concerns before the accounts' closures.
> [...]
> The Trump Organization alleges Capital One moved to distance itself from Donald 
> Trump after the Capitol riot and that the bank's cited anti-money-laundering 
> rationale was invented after the fact to cover for that decision.
> 
> Capital One has flatly denied those assertions, with its lawyers arguing in the 
> new filing that the Trump's theory rests on "cherry-picked quotations 
> unsupported by the full context" of the bank's own records, and that nothing in 
> the complaint shows the anti-money-laundering explanation was a cover story.
> [...]
> Beyond disputing the facts, Capital One has reiterated in the new court filing 
> it had the right to close any account "at any time, for any or no reason and 
> without notice" ? language the Trump companies do not dispute.
> 
> The presiding judge, Roy Altman, had already dismissed an earlier version of the 
> lawsuit in March on similar grounds, ruling that a bank's reason for closing an 
> account under that kind of open-ended contract clause generally cannot be 
> second-guessed in court.
> [...]
> Capital One's attorneys say the bank had no obligation to explain itself in the 
> first place, and separately argue that federal banking-secrecy law would have 
> barred it from disclosing internal anti-money-laundering findings even if it 
> wanted to.
> 
> https://www.npr.org/2026/08/02/g-s1-136834/capital-one-trump-bank-anti-money-laundering
> 
> Trumpstein and his two failsons are money launderers. This comes as a surprise 
> to no one.

Old and debunked. You know that.

-- 


https://rootbadger.com/invite/i7w9b9K7BUMNXZUDwPUvCxxZYcx4aKXrcoIVKJFt

https://ibb.co/q26Rmhn

NNTP friendly.