Re: Trump's Stagflation Begins

On 8/7/2026 4:18 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted 
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch 
of lies:
> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
>>
>> On 8/7/2026 1:31 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
>>>>
>>>> On 8/7/2026 12:20 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>>>> of lies:
>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>>>>> says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/7/26 04:22, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 6 Aug 2026 20:40:06 -0400, -hh
>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 8/6/26 19:57, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 6 Aug 2026 16:24:11 -0400, -hh wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 8/6/26 13:14, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 6 Aug 2026 09:36:09 -0400, -hh wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/5/26 16:14, Socialism is for losers wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You say you were speaking about your W2 from back in 2016 which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to suggest that you haven't one since 2016, which I do not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope, curb your speculation.  It just means that I've claimed to have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worked at a W2-based job as of a decade ago.  And that's all it means.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not likely that you dug out a ten year old w2 to check the reference
>>>>>>>>>>>>> number.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> When W2 'DD' started is easy to Google.  Checking one's own records are
>>>>>>>>>>>> easy too when they're digital.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ten years old?  Nope.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Just because you lack good records doesn't mean others have to suck too.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Similarly, claiming that you retired "long before" you were my current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> age is questionable, since you've not posted your age.  Nor your age at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which you allegedly retired.  Nor if it was due to disability, corporate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downsizing, relocation, an age-based mandate, by choice, or whatever.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For all we know, you were a squid who got passed over and forced out a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> twenty years at age ~40, who's since been scraping by on a leaky old
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 32ft boat that lacks a working engine in a cheap marina slip in Florida.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're free to believe that if you want. Unlike you, I'm not on Usenet
>>>>>>>>>>>>> looking for attaboys. FWIW, marina slips in Florida are not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> particularly cheap.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Naturally, "not particularly cheap" is also quite conveniently vague.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Depends on location, of course.  Vero Beach FL's City marina long-term
>>>>>>>>>>>> rates start at $16/ft-month, so a 30'er is ~$600, which is roughly a
>>>>>>>>>>>> third of what rent is for a local apartment.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Other places are even cheaper.  Case in point, zero marina fees:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/@ATAP...AnotherTime>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ok, some places you can park a boat are cheap. Where are you going
>>>>>>>>> with this?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Merely that yon boat attaboy isn't necessarily the flex.  /s
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry that you missed the boat.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nah; I've had boats for years.  The last was sold some years ago, as it
>>>>>> just wasn't being used enough to justify keeping it.  That's because we
>>>>>> all make choices based on our personal interests & priorities.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bragging again.
>>>>
>>>> He has stuff in his life worth bragging about, unlike a zero-achieving
>>>> do-nothing dole scrounger like you.
>>>
>>> You have no idea what he has.
>>
>> I do have some idea, and I know he has more than you.
> 
> So you believe what a usenet [sic] troll says?

No, I don't believe a fucking word you say, troll. It's written Usenet, with an 
upper case 'U'. It's a proper noun.

>>>>>>>> Not paying taxes on certain fringe benefits is a break from paying taxes
>>>>>>>> on compensation, which has a tangible and monetary value.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Indeed, like having an employer located where I could find free public
>>>>>>> parking (somerimes even funded with taxpayer money) and many good
>>>>>>> restaurants nearby for lunch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which of course isn't applicable to imputed income, since free public
>>>>>> parking is open to the general public.  But sure, commute time & costs
>>>>>> and where to live (& its costs), are all factors to be considered on
>>>>>> employment options.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Do they pay tax on the free parking?
>>>>
>>>> The parking isn't provided by the employer as a perk, you stupid fuckwit.
>>>
>>> It is
>>
>> It isn't. He clearly said it's public parking.
> 
> He said it was federal.

No, he didn't. He never said the word "federal" at all. He said, "since free 
public parking is open to the general public."

>>
>> as is the coffee that no one pays tax on.
>>>>
>>>>> You know like you claim they do on free coffee?
>>>>
>>>> No one said there is income tax paid on free coffee. Hugh made the point that
>>>> there could be. He's right, of course.
>>>
>>> There isn't and
>>
>> There could be, and Hugh proved it.
> 
> He proved nothing.

He proved that employer-provided coffee could conceivably be taxable to the 
employee.