Re: Aliens within four years!
Vincent Maycock <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 01:17:01 -0400, JTEM <[email protected]> wrote: >Vincent Maycock wrote: > >> LOL! You are stupid and gay. > >NOTE: The above is it's idea of a "Clever & on topic >reply" to the subject of alien life, and alien >micro organisms in particular. Just keeping pace with your insults there. > >> Sure I do, if we can > >Again, it's reacting to the topic of alien life and >alien microbes in particular. > >Not addressing, not "Sharing" a single word on the >topic, merely reacting. Emotionally. You want sharing? Is that part of your whole homosexual thing? >>> Personally, I'd say that there's PLENTY of evidence for >>> aliens, if you're not too stupid to realize that "Aliens" >>> would encompass micro organisms.... >> >> You're making progress. > >Now I feel bad because you have absolutely no redeeming >qualities. So why bother to reply to me? >And you're STILL just reacting. > >>> But, as the rule goes: Extraordinary claims require >>> extraordinary proof. >> >> Of course. > >STILL reacting, not addressing... That's just mindless repetition. >>> There's biosignatures detected not only within our solar >>> system but out beyond 100 light years away! > >> Biosignatures often have other explanations, though. > >Oh. You mean we'd want to study them -- send probes & >stuff? You know, "Do science." Like I talked about. > >Wow. How'd you miss it? Send probes? There are more efficient methods than that for investigating biosignatures. >>> There's >>> the structures inside of the famous "Mars Rock" that >>> not only look like fossils but if it were positively >>> identified as originating from Earth they would be accepted >>> as fossils! >> >> They certainly do look life microfossils > >As I pointed out, they passed scrutiny. The same testing that >would be considered confirmation of life, had it been an >earth rock, came back positive for the Mars rock. > >Do the Google on carbon isotopes. Ask a grown-up to help. LOL, kiddo. So you think we've found *definitive* evidence of life on Mars? It's a fact, in other words? >>> (Psst. They pass the test used to "Confirm" similarly >>> aged structures in earth rock as fossils) > >There's no mystery as to why you ignored the above, as >you are just reacting... I addressed that elsewhere. >>> We have also photographed structures on Mars that, if >>> found here on Earth, would unquestionably be associated >>> with life. There'd be no debate. >> >> That's only because life is so common on earth. > >No it isn't. You're making shit up. So you think life is *uncommon* on earth? >>> So Avi Loeb might've been a little bit optimistic on >>> his timing, but that's all. The issue is that NOT >>> confirming/falsifying life seems to be a very high >>> priority for our government. The money wasted on the >>> Ukraine war would have paid for more than a dozen >>> Martian return missions, >> >> LOL! Is this science or politics we're talking about? > >Sorry I didn't mean to trigger an even deeper emotional >spiral in you. There was no emotional spiral. >But I repeat: The money wasted on the war in the Ukraine >could have paid for a dozen Martian return-mission AND >left as with spare cash. How much is that in actual dollars? >Our priority was death, not science. What about the Iran war? >>> the funds flushed down the >>> toilet of CoronaPanic could have settled the arguments >>> over just about every potential home for life within >>> our solar system... with plenty of cash to spare. >> >> Cite? > >Fuck you. If you honestly are too stupid to just Google >the CoronaPanic spending then you honestly are too >stupid to hold an opinion. > >Say, speaking rhetorically: What search terms did you use? None, you stupid fuck. I asked you for a cite, rather than researching your claim for you. >>> Avi Loeb was optimistic NOT in our ability to find >>> and confirm alien life, but in overcoming the >>> resistance to finding & identifying that life. > >> And don't > >It comes down to priorities. You're a mentally ill troll >whose top priority is saying stupid shit, You know what they say about trolls? Don't feed them, so what are you doing replying to me? > which is why >you can't contribute to any discussion So why don't you just go the fuck away and have a discussion without me? > Humanity as a >whole isn't interested in aliens, not microbes anyway. No, that's ridiculous. Humans have always been fascinated with extra-terrestrial life -- space aliens, and all that. >There's a difference between skepticism and nay-saying. > >I won't even bother trying to explain what that difference >is... not like your disorder would allow you to grasp it. Your stupidity won't allow you to grasp that I'm a skeptic and not a nay-sayer.