Re: Why the electoral college is manifestly and obviously wrong and unjust
Mitchell Holman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.society.liberalism,alt.atheism,alt.fun,alt.politics.democrats.d,talk.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Organization | ViperNews - www.vipernews.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Attila <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]: > On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 17:59:08 +0000, Mitchell Holman > <[email protected]> in alt.atheism with message-id > <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Attila <[email protected]> wrote in >>news:[email protected]: >> >>> On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 13:19:03 +0000, Mitchell Holman >>> <[email protected]> in alt.atheism with message-id >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>>Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>news:[email protected]: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2026 10:44:46 -0400, Attila >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Each region elects it's own representative and the major >>>>>>population centers cannot dictate who the governor, >>>>>>Senators, or Representatives are for smaller states, >>>>>>Everyone has a voice. >>>>> >>>>> Then why do smaller states get to dictate to population centers who >>>>> gets elected to those offices? >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Exactly. Voters in eastern Washington and >>>>eastern Oregon bitch loudly about how their >>>>state politics are dominated by a few coastal >>>>cities but no one is proposing an EC. >>> >>> It would be impractical to implement a county by county EC >>> system for a state. One state cannot control the national >>> election. >> >> >> It is impractical to implement >>an EC anywhere. The whole idea is >>violation of one-man-one-vote >>democracy. > > No, it isn't. Each person still has one vote. We do not > have a democratic system allowing direct vote totals to > elect the President. If ballots from state X are given more weight than ballots from state Y then they are per se not equal.