Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God
Vincent Maycock <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 10:15:05 -0700, "Andrew" <[email protected]> wrote: >"Vincent Maycock" wrote in message news:[email protected]... >> "Andrew" wrote: >>>"Attila" wrote: >>>> "Andrew" wrote: >>>>>"Vincent Maycock" wrote: >>>>>> "Andrew" wrote: >>>>><<>> >>>>>>>Evidence tells us that an intelligence would be required >>>>>>>to place the specified instructions to synthesize a living >>>>>>>thing, inside of a DNA molecule. >>>>>> >>>>>> No, specified instructions can evolve quite easily, as >>>>>> long as there's selection pressure for that to occur. >>>>> >>>>>But they must exist before they can do any evolving.. >>>>>Only in your unscientific fantasies could they evolve >>>>>themselves into existence. >>>>> >>>> Nothing in any evolution theory or study involves the origin >>>> of life. Your constant attempts to tie the two together >>>> shows a number of things about you and your agenda. >>>> >>>> No matter how often you assert you beliefs that does not >>>> make them any closer to being true. >>> >>>You believe it happened by itself , contrary to real world >>>science that says > that it could NOT have. >>> >>>You have a non-theistic religion >> >> Mainstream science is not a religion > >As long as they stick with the true science Unlike you, they definitely do so. >> like your "explanation" is, > >Huh? I said mainstream science is not a religion, the way your beliefs are a religion. >> because mainstream science seeks to understand the world, > >Then go for it! Just stay away from the fantasy part and you'll >be OK. Tell us where the fantasy is in this research: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351666295_Evolution_of_the_genetic_code >> rather than ending that search by glibly saying "God did it." > >That's called a "straw-man fallacy", a device used by some >foolish folk who foolishly try to argue_against_the truth. What do you get scientifically from your ideas beyond "God did it"? >>> that forbids you from >>>accepting any science that exposes your religion to be >>>false and that you have been deceived. >> >> Why would God allow people to be deceived? > >Because He gives us permission to make our own choices. But we can't truly make our own choices if we're deceived, can we? >> Making a public appearance on the evening news might >> solve *that* problem, right? > >What a foolish retort! What's wrong with it? If God agreed to appear on national television and show everyone how they're being deceived by Satan, there would be no more deception because everyone would know what's true. That's not what we have now, though, obviously. What's your explanation for that?