Re: New aerial photos show scale of staggering destruction of Mar-A-Lago North
David Hartung <junk@LCMS_shitbags.org>
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.society.liberalism,alt.atheism,alt.fun,alt.politics.democrats.d,talk.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Organization | President emeritus of Shitbags-"R"-Us |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/17/2026 7:17 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies: > In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] > says... >> >> On 8/17/2026 5:26 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted >> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch >> of lies: >>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>> >>>> On 8/17/2026 1:59 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted >>>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch >>>> of lies: >>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>> >>>>>> Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>> >>>>>>> [Default] On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 13:06:57 +0000, Mitchell Holman >>>>>>> <[email protected]>, pretending to be Spammy posted some news: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote >>>>>>>>> [email protected] says... >>>>>>>>>> Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-08-07 07:31, Socialism is for losers wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 07 Aug 2026 Mitchell Holman wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Socialism is for losers wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 6 Aug 2026 Gronk wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Socialism is for losers wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 Jul 2026 13:10:08 +0000, Mitchell Holman wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 11 Jul 2026 18:08:08 -0500, super70s >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan was spot on and here's why >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://archive.ph/WBz6o >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oct. 23, 2025 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When President Harry S. Truman undertook a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> large-scale renovation of the White House in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1940s, the place was in such a state of disrepair >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that the leg of his daughter?s piano fell through >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the floor. As he embarked on a major overhaul, Mr. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Truman involved stakeholders far and wide. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Working with the House and Senate, Mr. Truman >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appointed a bipartisan, six-person commission to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oversee the project. He consulted the American >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Society of Civil Engineers and the Commission of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fine Arts, which approved sketches made by Lorenzo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S. Winslow, the White House architect, as well as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smaller details like fabric samples and color >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> schemes. Funds for the project ? more than $5 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> million at the time ? were approved by Congress >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after significant debate. ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See also >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House_Reconstructi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Truman had the White House gutted. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "bipartisan, six-person commission" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The bipartisan six-person commission was because >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taxpayers were paying for it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And taxpayers are getting stuck with a bill for 300 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> million for this. So, where is the "bipartisan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> six-person commission" ??? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The taxpayers will only be paying for the upgrade on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> underground security facility, which, IMHO, is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate. I don't care if you disagree. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump said private donations would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pay for the whole project. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assumes "facts" not in evidense. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump lied, and you fell for it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assumes "facts" not in evidense. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Facts...in evidence: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2026/06/16/reco >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rd s-r eveal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -600m-estimate-trumps-ballroom-project-with-half-taxpayers/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://archive.ph/I4kla >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Five months after the demolition of the White >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> House?s East Wing, President Donald Trump claimed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that the project to construct a massive ballroom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and a bunker in its place would cost up to $400 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> million and that private donors would pay for all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?This is taxpayer-free. We have no taxpayer putting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up 10 cents,? Trump told reporters in the Oval >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Office on March 31, describing the project as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including bomb shelters and major medical facilities. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But a detailed project summary prepared for the White >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> House by the contractor more than three weeks before >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump?s comments estimated the total construction >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cost at $600 million ? with more than half coming >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >from taxpayers, according to a copy of the contractor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> estimate obtained by The Washington Post. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The project will include security features. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So did the now-destroyed East Wing. >>>>>>>>>>>>> The old Presidential Emergency Operations Center under the East >>>>>>>>>>>>> Wing was built 80 years ago, Dummy. The new one will be bigger >>>>>>>>>>>>> and better and more secure. Don't you think the President >>>>>>>>>>>>> should have the best protection available? >>>>>>>>>>>> It was originally built 80 years ago... >>>>>>>>>>>> ...but it has been continually upgraded for the entire time it >>>>>>>>>>>> existed. >>>>>>>>>>> The new one will be bigger and better and more secure. Don't you >>>>>>>>>>> think the President should have the best protection available? >>>>>>>>>> An airplane food service cart is all >>>>>>>>>> the protection Trump needs. >>>>>>>>> So will this be your lame go to since the pond thing is worn out? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Trump is the gift that keeps on giving. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Maybe if we pushed the food service cart *into* the reflecting pool? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It needs to be given it's own >>>>>> room in the Trump Library. >>>>> >>>>> What would have suggested he do at that time the threat was made? >>>> >>>> There was no credible threat. Trumpstein is a fat fucking coward, just like you. >>> >>> If there was no threat then why did he do it. >> >> Because he's a chickenshit. > > A chicken shit from what? Everything. > You said there was no threat. There wasn't. Trumpstein the chickenshit was imagining it. >> >> The image of him crawling on his belly into that galley truck is just fucking >> hilarious. > > Why did you snip? I didn't. > So you can't prove there was no threat. You can't prove there was one. The logical conclusion is, no threat. Trumpstein is just a chickenshit.