Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God

"Vincent Maycock" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> "Andrew" wrote:
>>"Vincent Maycock" wrote:     
>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>"Attila" wrote:   
>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>>"Vincent Maycock" wrote:   
>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>><<>>
>>>>>>>>Evidence tells us that an intelligence would be required
>>>>>>>>to place the specified instructions to synthesize a living
>>>>>>>>thing, inside of a DNA molecule.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> No, specified instructions can evolve quite easily, as 
>>>>>>> long as there's selection pressure for that to occur.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>But they must exist before they can do any evolving..
>>>>>>Only in your unscientific fantasies could they evolve
>>>>>>themselves into existence.  
>>>>>>
>>>>> Nothing in any evolution theory or study involves the origin
>>>>> of life.  Your constant attempts to tie the two together
>>>>> shows a number of things about you and your agenda.
>>>>> 
>>>>> No matter how often you assert you beliefs that does not
>>>>> make them any closer to being true.
>>>>
>>>>You believe it happened by itself , contrary to real world 
>>>>science that says > that it could NOT have. 
>>>>
>>>>You have a non-theistic religion
>>> 
>>> Mainstream science is not a religion
>>
>>As long as they stick with the true science
> 
> Unlike you, they definitely do so. 

That's what you think, so you believe_whatever_they
say. Which helps explain why you are so deceived.

>>> like your "explanation"  is,
>>
>>Huh?
> 
> I said mainstream science is not a religion, the way
> your beliefs are a religion.   

Except that my beliefs are in harmony with true science,
whereas yours are dependent upon a platform built upon
fantasy.

>>> because mainstream science seeks to understand the world,
 
Seeking to understand the Creation that was Created by our Creator. .

>>Then go for it! Just stay away from the fantasy part and you'll be OK.
> 
> Tell us where the fantasy is in this research: 
> 
> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351666295_Evolution_of_the_genetic_code

Interesting that you would post that because the whole thing 
is ~one big fantasy~! They are fantacized  "models" they say!

>>> rather than ending that search by glibly saying "God did it." 

I don't recall exactly saying that,  However you are correct..

--->>> "God did it." 

Thanks Vince!         

>>That's called a "straw-man fallacy", a device used by some 
>>foolish  folk who foolishly try to argue_against_the truth.
> 
> What do you get scientifically from your ideas beyond "God did it"?

When we study more of the Creation, we are learning more
about our most awesome and wonderful Creator; the living
                                    -----> GOD <-----