Re: Trump Gets Schooled On Carrier Launch Systems

On 8/20/2026 10:37 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted 
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch 
of lies:
> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> says...
>>
>> On 8/20/2026 8:31 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
>>>>
>>>> On 8/20/2026 7:47 AM, Alan wrote:
>>>>> On 2026-08-20 03:55, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2026 08:00:27 -0700, Alan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2026-08-19 04:02, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2026 15:30:22 +0000, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> NoBody <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 15:07:56 +0000, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Governor Swill <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [Default] On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 16:49:08 +0000, Lee <[email protected]>,
>>>>>>>>>>>> pretending to be Spammy posted some news:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> NoBody <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 16:21:01 +0000, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NoBody <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 14 Aug 2026 16:16:20 +0000, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mark Kelly on aircraft carrier catapult
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order: "Donald Trump knows nothing about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this stuff"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 08/14/26
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) blasted President
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump on Thursday for ordering the U.S. Navy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to revert to older catapult systems on its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aircraft carriers, arguing the change would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be costly while questioning Trump?s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> qualifications to make such a call.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So a Democrat hates what a Republican proposes.  How is this news?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      Who knows more about carrier catapults,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a carrier pilot or Trump?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would a pilot know about the engineering differences or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reliability of the design?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>        Because carrier pilots work with catapults
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Trump has never seen one.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I suspect you're arguing just because it's Kremlin Girl.  The fact is,
>>>>>>>>>>>> the question is well taken.  For example, I drive a car but I have no
>>>>>>>>>>>> idea how an automatic transmission works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "In practice, EMALS struggled with reliability. Early testing showed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> frequent failures. Launch rates were below targets. Maintenance was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> far more complex than expected. The system could launch aircraft.
>>>>>>>>> But
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doing it consistently, at scale, in real operational conditions?
>>>>>>>>> That
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> took far longer than planned. For a carrier, reliability isn?t a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> luxury. It?s the entire mission."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       That is a Navy issue not a president issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       What's next - Trump dictatiing drone designs?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump dictating satellite designs? Trump dictating
>>>>>>>>>>>>> submarine sonars?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dicktating Elon?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.navair.navy.mil/product/Electromagnetic-Aircraft-Launch-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> System-EMALS
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That reads like a marketing piece.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>      I would wager the Navy knows more about
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Naval aviation than President Bone Spurs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> EMALS is new technology.  So were steam launchers, computers and
>>>>>>>>>>>> fireplace chimneys in their time.  As the Navy works with this new
>>>>>>>>>>>> technology, it's reliability will go up and costs will go down.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> One falling cost is the aircraft themselves.  Steam catapaults yank
>>>>>>>>>>>> the plane forward with a sudden lurch which increases wear and tear on
>>>>>>>>>>>> airframes as well as the hooking system.  EMALS is tuned to gradiently
>>>>>>>>>>>> accelerate up to full power thus reducing shock stress on metal
>>>>>>>>>>>> thereby extending the life of naval airframes.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>       Trump wants steam catapults because
>>>>>>>>>>> they look cool in WWII movies. Trump
>>>>>>>>>>> wants battleships because they look
>>>>>>>>>>> cool in WWII movies.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>       The Navy is planning for the future
>>>>>>>>>>> with president who lives in the past.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> As already proven to you, the magnetic ones don't work as promised.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       It works for every navy operating
>>>>>>>>> aircraft carriers.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_Aircraft_Launch_System
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Really?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.thedefensenews.com/Why-the-US-Navy-Is-Slow-to-Adopt-
>>>>>>>> Electromagnetic-Catapults-While-China-Becomes-First-to-Deploy-EM-Catapults/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This disagrees with you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually, no.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It points out that retrofitting such a system to existing carriers isn't
>>>>>>> practical, which isn't nearly the same as saying that EMALS doesn't work.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your reading comprehension sucks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The article was about overall usage of the technology, not just
>>>>>> retrofits.
>>>>>
>>>>> No. It was explicitly and only about why the US Navy isn't retrofitting it to
>>>>> older carriers.
>>>>>
>>>>> "However, despite the initial excitement, the United States has not yet adopted
>>>>> electromagnetic catapult systems across its entire carrier fleet. In fact, only
>>>>> the USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) currently uses EMALS, while the rest of the
>>>>> Navy?s carriers still rely on tried-and-tested steam catapults."
>>>>
>>>> The steam catapults work well enough on those carriers that have them. The
>>>> EMALS, while better, are not enough better to justify the cost of retrofitting.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Why get rid of technology that works?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>      It doesn't work when it come to launching
>>>>>>>>> more fragile aircraft like drones, when is
>>>>>>>>> why the Navy is trying to replace it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Citation?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And SILENCE.
>>>>>
>>>>> I didn't claim it, so why are you looking to me to cite it?
>>>>
>>>> Kremlin Girl does that a lot.
>>>
>>> Alan hates you.
>>
>> No, he doesn't. He engages with me.
> 
> Is that what you call it? He engages with me too but I know he hates me.

He doesn't hate you — he holds you in complete and well-deserved contempt. If he 
were in a coma and intubated, he's still make far more sense than you. You're a 
fucking idiot.