Re: Grab-A-Gun
Harlan Banks <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.society.liberalism,alt.atheism,alt.fun,alt.politics.democrats.d,talk.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Organization | Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/20/2026 2:14 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch of lies: > In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >> >> On 2026-08-20 10:56, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>> >>>> On 2026-08-20 10:32, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2026-08-20 06:50, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2026-08-19 18:18, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-08-19 07:07, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-08-18 16:19, Socialism is for losers wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2026 22:37:10 -0000 (UTC), pothead >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-08-18, Socialism is for losers <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2026 10:20:31 -0700, Alan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-08-18 10:10, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You tards bring up shit from 30 years ago thinking it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant to your hate mission. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Says someone still fixated on Whitewater >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Vince Foster and MonicaGate and Kerry's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> medals. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I never talk about that shit. But you love bringing up 30 years ago >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when Trump tied his tie wrong. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump raping children 30 years ago was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hardly "tieing his tie wrong". >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet no one can prove that ever happened. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then why is Trump covering up the Epstein files? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who said he is? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> His administration has blocked the release of much (if not most) of what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they are required to release BY LAW. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Biden DOJ also refused to release Epstein files for unknown >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reasons. It seems to me that if either Biden's DOJ or Trump's DOJ had >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something on the other side they would put it out there. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps the issue is not about any US politicians of either party >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being involved. Perhaps there are officials from other countries who >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are being protected. Officials with whom both sides must deal with.... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> My position has always been that I support the victims, no >>>>>>>>>>>>>> matter what. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If they are proven to be lying, so be it, but this is one case >>>>>>>>>>>>>> where I am 100% behind it, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> My suspicion is that this Epstein incident turned out to be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bigger than anyone, and that includes both parties, thought it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> would become. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Included are some of the most powerful people on earth and they >>>>>>>>>>>>>> needed to be protected because like a spider web prosecuting one >>>>>>>>>>>>>> will lead to another which will lead to yet another etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Both sides got together on this one and stalled as best as >>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible in their own way in order to protect these people, some >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of whom are no doubt themselves. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> While the democrats and republicans love to attack each other, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes they join forces in circling the wagons and this is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> surely one of those times. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's my own, unproven theory. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Again, the victims deserve justice. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, and as for Ghislaine Maxwell, she obviously has some diary >>>>>>>>>>>>>> naming names stashed away somewhere in multiple places which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the only reason she is still alive. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that was precisely why Todd Blanche paid her a visit and got >>>>>>>>>>>>>> her transferred to a less secure prison. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was a mission to probe her to see how much she knew. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It sure seems to me that the people who have seen it all, no matter >>>>>>>>>>>>> what party they are on, want it kept quiet. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> And yet it is Trump's administration that is actually defying the law. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Both side are. You know this but choose to direct your blame. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> How is the other side defying the law on the Epstein files? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> They had them for 4 years. You know they looked at them. Why didn't they >>>>>>>>> release them. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And even if that were true, there was no LAW that demanded they be released. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yet if there was dirt on Trump they would have and you know it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What are you claiming they are DOING that is in defiance of the law, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Huh? >>>>>>>> Are you really that thick, Cupcake? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Huh? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> So you really really ARE that thick. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cupcake. You said: >>>>>> >>>>>> "Both side are" as your reply to someone who said: >>>>>> >>>>>> "And yet it is Trump's administration that is actually defying the law." >>>>>> >>>>>> Now the word "are" is what people who actually aren't thick understand >>>>>> to be what we call the "present tense". Its use in that sentence is you >>>>>> saying that something is CURRENTLY happening. >>>>> >>>>> YOU don't get to determine what I meant. You do that all the time. >>>> >>>> Actually, I get to interpret your words according to the rules of >>>> English usage? >>> >>> You don't do that. You assume. >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> And so I ask you again: >>>>>> >>>>>> How is anyone OTHER than the Trump administration defying the law on the >>>>>> release of the Epstein files? >>>>> >>>>> And you did it again. Why didn't Biden release them? >>>> Answer this question: >>>> >>>> Was it a legal requirement that he do so? >>> >>> You are spinning away again. If the left is innocent then why didn't they >>> release them? >>>> >> If Trump is innocent, why hasn't he released them... > > Why do you ignore the question of Biden not releasing them? B-b-but BIDEN! That's been fully addressed, shitbag. >> >> ...when he is required by law to do so? > > Ask him. We already know why: because he's a rapist and evidence of his rape and other abuse is in the unreleased files.