Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God
Alan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-08-21 13:23, Skeeter wrote: > In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >> >> On 2026-08-21 10:57, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>> >>>> On 2026-08-21 09:53, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2026-08-21 09:08, Andrew wrote: >>>>>>> "Attila" wrote in message >>>>>>> news:[email protected]... >>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote: >>>>>>> <<>> >>>>>>>>> Folks, if there is no plausible Darwinian pathway for our >>>>>>>>> origins, then pure logic points us to Creation by a most >>>>>>>>> awesome and wonderful Creator. . . >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The process is not yet known, that's all. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For those who accept what science has already discovered, there is no >>>>>>> debate. They know that...., >>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life." >>>>>>> That is > an established scientific law. >>>>>> >>>>>> No, it absolutely is not. >>>>> >>>>> Then tell us how i all went down. No big bang shit either. >>>>> >>>> >>>> So if I don't know how "i [sic] all went down"... >>>> >>>> ...I can't point out that there is no "established scientific law" that >>>> "established scientific law"? >>> >>> And away he spins and does the semantics game. Must be time to run away. >>> >>> >>> >> >> Nope. >> >> I was pointing out a logical fallacy. > > No you were trying to form a debate where there wasn't one. > Nope. I was pointing out the logical fallacy that one must be able to answer every question to declare one statement false.