Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God

In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
> 
> On 2026-08-21 13:23, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
> >>
> >> On 2026-08-21 10:57, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2026-08-21 09:53, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2026-08-21 09:08, Andrew wrote:
> >>>>>>> "Attila" wrote in message
> >>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
> >>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
> >>>>>>> <<>>
> >>>>>>>>> Folks, if there is no plausible Darwinian pathway for our
> >>>>>>>>> origins, then pure logic points us to Creation by a most
> >>>>>>>>> awesome and wonderful Creator. . .
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The process is not yet known, that's all.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> For those who accept what science has already discovered, there is no
> >>>>>>> debate. They know that....,
> >>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life."
> >>>>>>> That is > an established scientific law.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> No, it absolutely is not.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Then tell us how i all went down. No big bang shit either.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> So if I don't know how "i [sic] all went down"...
> >>>>
> >>>> ...I can't point out that there is no "established scientific law" that
> >>>> "established scientific law"?
> >>>
> >>> And away he spins and does the semantics game. Must be time to run away.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Nope.
> >>
> >> I was pointing out a logical fallacy.
> > 
> > No you were trying to form a debate where there wasn't one.
> > 
> 
> Nope.
> 
> I was pointing out the logical fallacy that one must be able to answer 
> every question to declare one statement false.

No you were nit picking. So tell us how we came about.

-- 


https://rootbadger.com/invite/i7w9b9K7BUMNXZUDwPUvCxxZYcx4aKXrcoIVKJFt

https://ibb.co/q26Rmhn

NNTP friendly.