Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God
Rudy Canoza <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh |
|---|---|
| Organization | Jolly Kone |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Alan <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]: > On 2026-08-21 13:23, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>> >>> On 2026-08-21 10:57, Skeeter wrote: >>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>> >>>>> On 2026-08-21 09:53, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>> says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2026-08-21 09:08, Andrew wrote: >>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:[email protected]... >>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote: >>>>>>>> <<>> >>>>>>>>>> Folks, if there is no plausible Darwinian pathway for our >>>>>>>>>> origins, then pure logic points us to Creation by a most >>>>>>>>>> awesome and wonderful Creator. . . >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The process is not yet known, that's all. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For those who accept what science has already discovered, there >>>>>>>> is no debate. They know that...., >>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life." >>>>>>>> That is > an established scientific law. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, it absolutely is not. >>>>>> >>>>>> Then tell us how i all went down. No big bang shit either. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So if I don't know how "i [sic] all went down"... >>>>> >>>>> ...I can't point out that there is no "established scientific law" >>>>> that "established scientific law"? >>>> >>>> And away he spins and does the semantics game. Must be time to run >>>> away. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Nope. >>> >>> I was pointing out a logical fallacy. >> >> No you were trying to form a debate where there wasn't one. >> > > Nope. > > I was pointing out the logical fallacy that one must be able to answer > every question to declare one statement false. > Why do you waste time with him? Why don't you like me? No one seems to.