Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God
Skeeter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh |
|---|---|
| Organization | UTB |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... > > On 2026-08-21 15:21, Skeeter wrote: > > In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... > >> > >> On 2026-08-21 13:23, Skeeter wrote: > >>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... > >>>> > >>>> On 2026-08-21 10:57, Skeeter wrote: > >>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 2026-08-21 09:53, Skeeter wrote: > >>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 2026-08-21 09:08, Andrew wrote: > >>>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote in message > >>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]... > >>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote: > >>>>>>>>> <<>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Folks, if there is no plausible Darwinian pathway for our > >>>>>>>>>>> origins, then pure logic points us to Creation by a most > >>>>>>>>>>> awesome and wonderful Creator. . . > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> The process is not yet known, that's all. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> For those who accept what science has already discovered, there is no > >>>>>>>>> debate. They know that...., > >>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life." > >>>>>>>>> That is > an established scientific law. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> No, it absolutely is not. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Then tell us how i all went down. No big bang shit either. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> So if I don't know how "i [sic] all went down"... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ...I can't point out that there is no "established scientific law" that > >>>>>> "established scientific law"? > >>>>> > >>>>> And away he spins and does the semantics game. Must be time to run away. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Nope. > >>>> > >>>> I was pointing out a logical fallacy. > >>> > >>> No you were trying to form a debate where there wasn't one. > >>> > >> > >> Nope. > >> > >> I was pointing out the logical fallacy that one must be able to answer > >> every question to declare one statement false. > > > > No you were nit picking. So tell us how we came about. > > > > Nope. > > So you tell us how we came about. I never claimed to know. > > And saying "God did it" isn't sufficient unless you explain how god came > about, too. Who says? > > Saying he always existed, then I answer, "Well the universe always existed". If there is a God then he always existed. There is a universe so tell us how it came about. -- https://rootbadger.com/invite/i7w9b9K7BUMNXZUDwPUvCxxZYcx4aKXrcoIVKJFt https://ibb.co/q26Rmhn NNTP friendly.