Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God
dna <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.democrats.d,alt.politics.trump,sac.politics,talk.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ubiquitous <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]: > On 8/22/2026 3:16 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, > convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted > another content-free batch of lies: >> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>> >>> On 2026-08-22 14:01, Skeeter wrote: >>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>> >>>>> On 2026-08-22 07:53, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>> says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2026-08-21 15:56, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2026-08-21 15:27, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-08-21 13:40, Andrew wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]... >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote: > "Andrew" wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, if there is no plausible Darwinian pathway for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> our origins, then pure logic points us to Creation by a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> most awesome and wonderful Creator. . . >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The process is not yet known, that's all. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who accept what science has already discovered, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is no debate. They know that...., >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life." >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is > an established scientific law. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Look it up, its called, "The Law of Biogenesis" >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life." >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 'A Common Misconception >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Some creationists have argued that the law of biogenesis >>>>>>>>>>> undermines evolutionary theory and the theory that all life >>>>>>>>>>> originated from inorganic material billions of years ago. >>>>>>>>>>> However, biogenesis simply invalidates the theory of >>>>>>>>>>> spontaneous generation?it speaks to what can be accomplished >>>>>>>>>>> in generational time spans, not over the course of >>>>>>>>>>> thousands of generations or millions of years.' >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.sciencing.com/theory-biogenesis-5419233/> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Accoring to whom? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> All those who accept empirical science. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So that leaves you out. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You will have a lot of explaining to do when >>>>>>>>>>>>> life is found on >>>>>>>>>>>>> exoplanets.... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> God already told us about that.. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "For thus saith the Lord that created the heavens, God >>>>>>>>>>>> Himself that formed the earth and made it >>>>>>>>>>>> He hath established it, He created it not in vain, He >>>>>>>>>>>> formed it to be inhabited:" ~ Isaiah 45:18 >>>>>>>>>>> And where did your god come from? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Alan tries again. Tell us where we came from. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You tell us where we came from and everyone you put "god", >>>>>>>>> I'll put universe. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I never claimed to know where we came from. The universe also >>>>>>>> came from something. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sure you did. You said "god did it". >>>>>> >>>>>> I said in context to "if there was a god". You know that and are >>>>>> trying to spin it again. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You claimed that that there is a god and he created the universe, >>>>> Cupcake. >>>> >>>> I didn't claim that. I said IF there were a God. Alan trying to >>>> shuffle out again. >>> >>> Nope. You explicitly said that god did it and justified with with >>> the inane idea that somehow matter requires a creator but a "god" >>> doesn't. >> >> You are way off base spin boy. If there is a God then he did it. > > That doesn't follow. How do you know she didn't just sit around and > watch it happen? Why is it important? > If there is a god — and there's no reason to think there is or ever > was — it's perfectly plausible she is a completely passive god who > never lifted a finger to "create" anything. Did you know that we can recreate you in a lab with a tail and two heads from a fingernail clipping?