Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God
Skeeter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh |
|---|---|
| Organization | UTB |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... > > Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in > news:[email protected]: > > > In article <[email protected]>, > > [email protected] says... > >> > >> On Sat, 22 Aug 2026 09:05:26 -0600, Skeeter > >> <[email protected]> in alt.atheism with message-id > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> >In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... > >> >> > >> >> On 8/21/2026 1:40 PM, Andrew wrote: > >> >> > "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message > >> >> > news:[email protected]... > >> >> >> "Andrew" wrote: > >> >> >>> "Attila" wrote: Â > "Andrew" wrote: > >> >> >>> <<>> > >> >> >>>>> Folks, if there is no plausible Darwinian pathway for our > >> >> >>>>> origins, then pure logic points us to Creation by a most > >> >> >>>>> awesome and wonderful Creator. . . > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> The process is not yet known, that's all. > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> For those who accept what science has already discovered, > >> >> >>> there is no debate. They know that...., > >> >> >>> "Life comes only from previously existing life." > >> >> >>> That is > an established scientific law. > >> >> > > >> >> > Look it up, its called, "The Law of Biogenesis" > >> >> > >> >> No such "law" [sic]. > >> >> > >> >> Gemini: > >> >> > >> >> The "Law of Biogenesis" is a *historical term* rather than a > >> >> rigid universal law. It describes the biological principle > >> >> that living organisms come only from other living organisms, > >> >> disproving spontaneous generation. However, it does not rule > >> >> out abiogenesis. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Look: we get that you're a believer in fairy tales. Stop > >> >> pretending there's any science or "laws" [sic] behind your fairy > >> >> tales. There isn't any. > >> > > >> >So how did we all come about? > >> > >> One of the huge number of things that are not yet known. > > > > Exactly my point. I am just comparing the "god" theory and the science > > theory. > > > > > There is no god theory, there are only god conclusions. That made no sense. > > > Earthquakes? God did it. (oops, science proves that wrong) > > > Tornadoes? God did it. (oops, science proves that wrong) > > > Plagues? God did it. (oops, science proves that wrong) > > > Eclipses? God did it. (oops, science proves that wrong) > > > Rainbows? God did it. (oops, science proves that wrong) > > > Droughts? God did it. (oops, science proves that wrong) > > > Infertility? God did it. (oops, science proves that wrong) Who said God did those things? Oh YOU did. -- https://rootbadger.com/invite/i7w9b9K7BUMNXZUDwPUvCxxZYcx4aKXrcoIVKJFt https://ibb.co/q26Rmhn https://play.google.com/store/search?q=rootbadger&c=apps&utm_source=na_Med NNTP friendly.