Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God

Skeeter <[email protected]>
Newsgroups alt.atheism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Organization UTB
Message-ID <[email protected]>
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
> 
> Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
> news:[email protected]: 
> 
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > [email protected] says...
> >> 
> >> On Sat, 22 Aug 2026 09:05:26 -0600, Skeeter
> >> <[email protected]> in alt.atheism with message-id
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
> >> >> 
> >> >> On 8/21/2026 1:40 PM, Andrew wrote:
> >> >> > "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
> >> >> > news:[email protected]... 
> >> >> >> "Andrew" wrote:
> >> >> >>> "Attila" wrote:  > "Andrew" wrote:
> >> >> >>> <<>>
> >> >> >>>>> Folks, if there is no plausible Darwinian pathway for our
> >> >> >>>>> origins, then pure logic points us to Creation by a most
> >> >> >>>>> awesome and wonderful Creator. . . 
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> The process is not yet known, that's all.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> For those who accept what science has already discovered,
> >> >> >>> there is no debate. They know that....,
> >> >> >>> "Life comes only from previously existing life."
> >> >> >>> That is > an established scientific law.
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Look it up, its called, "The Law of Biogenesis"
> >> >> 
> >> >> No such "law" [sic].
> >> >> 
> >> >> Gemini:
> >> >> 
> >> >>     The "Law of Biogenesis" is a *historical term* rather than a
> >> >>     rigid universal law. It describes the biological principle
> >> >>     that living organisms come only from other living organisms,
> >> >>     disproving spontaneous generation. However, it does not rule
> >> >>     out abiogenesis. 
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >> Look: we get that you're a believer in fairy tales. Stop
> >> >> pretending there's any science or "laws" [sic] behind your fairy
> >> >> tales. There isn't any. 
> >> >
> >> >So how did we all come about?
> >> 
> >> One of the huge number of things that are not yet known.
> > 
> > Exactly my point. I am just comparing the "god" theory and the science
> > theory. 
> > 
> 
>    
> There is no god theory, there are only god conclusions. 

That made no sense.
> 
> 
> Earthquakes? God did it. (oops, science proves that wrong)
> 
> 
> Tornadoes? God did it. (oops, science proves that wrong)
> 
> 
> Plagues? God did it. (oops, science proves that wrong)
> 
> 
> Eclipses? God did it. (oops, science proves that wrong)
> 
> 
> Rainbows? God did it. (oops, science proves that wrong)
> 
> 
> Droughts? God did it. (oops, science proves that wrong)
> 
> 
> Infertility? God did it. (oops, science proves that wrong)

Who said God did those things? Oh YOU did.



-- 


https://rootbadger.com/invite/i7w9b9K7BUMNXZUDwPUvCxxZYcx4aKXrcoIVKJFt

https://ibb.co/q26Rmhn

https://play.google.com/store/search?q=rootbadger&c=apps&utm_source=na_Med

NNTP friendly.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.