Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God
Dawn Flood <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/23/2026 10:19 AM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >> >> Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in >> news:[email protected]: >> >>> In article <[email protected]>, >>> [email protected] says... >>>> >>>> On Sat, 22 Aug 2026 09:05:26 -0600, Skeeter >>>> <[email protected]> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On 8/21/2026 1:40 PM, Andrew wrote: >>>>>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message >>>>>>> news:[email protected]... >>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote: >>>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote: > "Andrew" wrote: >>>>>>>>> <<>> >>>>>>>>>>> Folks, if there is no plausible Darwinian pathway for our >>>>>>>>>>> origins, then pure logic points us to Creation by a most >>>>>>>>>>> awesome and wonderful Creator. . . >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The process is not yet known, that's all. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For those who accept what science has already discovered, >>>>>>>>> there is no debate. They know that...., >>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life." >>>>>>>>> That is > an established scientific law. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Look it up, its called, "The Law of Biogenesis" >>>>>> >>>>>> No such "law" [sic]. >>>>>> >>>>>> Gemini: >>>>>> >>>>>> The "Law of Biogenesis" is a *historical term* rather than a >>>>>> rigid universal law. It describes the biological principle >>>>>> that living organisms come only from other living organisms, >>>>>> disproving spontaneous generation. However, it does not rule >>>>>> out abiogenesis. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Look: we get that you're a believer in fairy tales. Stop >>>>>> pretending there's any science or "laws" [sic] behind your fairy >>>>>> tales. There isn't any. >>>>> >>>>> So how did we all come about? >>>> >>>> One of the huge number of things that are not yet known. >>> >>> Exactly my point. I am just comparing the "god" theory and the science >>> theory. >>> >> >> >> There is no god theory, there are only god conclusions. > > That made no sense. >> >> >> Earthquakes? God did it. (oops, science proves that wrong) >> >> >> Tornadoes? God did it. (oops, science proves that wrong) >> >> >> Plagues? God did it. (oops, science proves that wrong) >> >> >> Eclipses? God did it. (oops, science proves that wrong) >> >> >> Rainbows? God did it. (oops, science proves that wrong) >> >> >> Droughts? God did it. (oops, science proves that wrong) >> >> >> Infertility? God did it. (oops, science proves that wrong) > > Who said God did those things? Oh YOU did. > > > Why won't God just instantaneously heal an adult amputee and settle the matter once & for all?!