Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God
Alan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-08-22 15:10, Skeeter wrote: > In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >> >> On 2026-08-22 13:56, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>> >>>> On 2026-08-22 07:53, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2026-08-21 15:55, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2026-08-21 15:27, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2026 10:53:22 -0600, Skeeter >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-08-21 09:08, Andrew wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]... >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> <<>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, if there is no plausible Darwinian pathway for our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> origins, then pure logic points us to Creation by a most >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> awesome and wonderful Creator. . . >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The process is not yet known, that's all. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who accept what science has already discovered, there is no >>>>>>>>>>>>> debate. They know that...., >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life." >>>>>>>>>>>>> That is > an established scientific law. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> No, it absolutely is not. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Then tell us how i all went down. No big bang shit either. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No one knows the origin of life - yet. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's all theories. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But the scientific theories are backed up by observed facts. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So someone watched the big bang? Did someone actually the first form of life? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Nope. >>>>>> >>>>>> But why do you think those are the only facts? >>>>> >>>>> Who said that was all I thought? Oh you did. You can't point out anything that >>>>> shows where it all came from. ll you can do is argue. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I can't point out lots of facts that support the best theories about the >>>> age and nature of the universe... >>> >>> Then go sit down. >>>> >>>> ...and all you can point out are a lot of myths in a book which is >>>> obviously wrong about so much. >>> >>> I point out both sides. You choose to nit pick for the sake of an argument. >>> There are theories and there are myths. I never said if there was a God or not. >>> I said if there was then creation makes sense. Now tell me about entropy. >>> >>> >>> >> >> Name one thing you've pointed out about the other side of this debate.. >> >> ONE THING. > > Go back and read. I never claimed either. I just pointed out the differences > and why "if" there was a God then it makes sense. So far it makes more sense > than a big bang. Now spin this one around. > Nope. "If" there's a god it just asks the next logical question: where did it come from?