Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God
Alan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-08-22 16:11, Skeeter wrote: > In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >> >> On 2026-08-22 14:17, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] >>> says... >>>> >>>> On Sat, 22 Aug 2026 09:05:26 -0600, Skeeter >>>> <[email protected]> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On 8/21/2026 1:40 PM, Andrew wrote: >>>>>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:[email protected]... >>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote: >>>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote: > "Andrew" wrote: >>>>>>>>> <<>> >>>>>>>>>>> Folks, if there is no plausible Darwinian pathway for our >>>>>>>>>>> origins, then pure logic points us to Creation by a most >>>>>>>>>>> awesome and wonderful Creator. . . >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The process is not yet known, that's all. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For those who accept what science has already discovered, there is no debate. >>>>>>>>> They know that...., >>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life." >>>>>>>>> That is > an established scientific law. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Look it up, its called, "The Law of Biogenesis" >>>>>> >>>>>> No such "law" [sic]. >>>>>> >>>>>> Gemini: >>>>>> >>>>>> The "Law of Biogenesis" is a *historical term* rather than a rigid universal >>>>>> law. It describes the biological principle that living organisms come only >>>>>> from other living organisms, disproving spontaneous generation. However, it >>>>>> does not rule out abiogenesis. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Look: we get that you're a believer in fairy tales. Stop pretending there's any >>>>>> science or "laws" [sic] behind your fairy tales. There isn't any. >>>>> >>>>> So how did we all come about? >>>> >>>> One of the huge number of things that are not yet known. >>> >>> Exactly my point. I am just comparing the "god" theory and the science theory. >>> >> >> You are absolutely not doing that. > > I have been and now you choose to spin it around because you can't defend your > stand. I asked you more than once. Do you believe in God? If so then why? If > not than why? You must have some facts that show there can't be a God. > Otherwise you wouldn't be sure. You don't know and I promise you when you're on > your death bed you will be hoping there is. > Nope. You are absolutely not comparing them. I don't believe in any god. And no: I don't need to have any facts NOT to believe in something. Do you believe in the flying spaghetti monster?