Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God

In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
> 
> On 2026-08-22 15:43, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
> >>
> >> On 2026-08-22 04:26, Andrew wrote:
> >>> "Alan" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> >>>> Andrew wrote:
> >>>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote:
> >>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
> >>>>>>> "Attila" wrote
> >>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
> >>>>>>> <<>>
> >>>>>>>>> Folks, if there is no plausible Darwinian pathway for our
> >>>>>>>>> origins, then pure logic points us to Creation by a most
> >>>>>>>>> awesome and wonderful Creator. . .
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The process is not yet known, that's all.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> For those who accept what science has already discovered, there is
> >>>>>>> no debate.
> >>>>>>> They know that....,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> That is an established scientific law.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Look it up, its called, "The Law of Biogenesis"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life."
> >>>>
> >>>> 'A Common Misconception
> >>>
> >>> Have any exceptions ever been note?
> >>> None, except in the fantasy world of
> >>> the fool.
> >>>
> >>>> Some creationists have argued that the law
> >>>> of biogenesis undermines evolutionary theory
> >>>
> >>> Yes, it undermines the "goo to you" deceptioen that
> >>> has deceived the gullible masses, who simply accept
> >>> whatever they are told.
> >>>
> >>>> and the theory that all life originated from
> >>>> inorganic material billions of years ago.
> >>>
> >>> What a bunch of unscientific nonsense!
> >>>
> >>>> However, biogenesis simply invalidates
> >>>> the theory of spontaneous generation?
> >>>
> >>> OK, so it's invalidated. And exposes
> >>> the fact that you have been deceived.
> >> All it invalidated was the idea that COMPLEX organisms arise sponteneously.
> > 
> > They can't. What's your point?
> 
> That that is all that was proven wrong.
> 
> >>
> >> In specific, it disproved the notion that flies simply arise from
> >> rotting meat.
> > 
> > Nope.
> >>
> 
> Yup. That is literally the first way it was tested.
> 
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_generation#Pasteur_and_Tyndall>
> 
> 
> >> But you didn't bother even looking into it, did you?
> > 
> > Unlike you who twists things all around?
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> it speaks to what can be accomplished in generational time spans, not
> >>>> over the
> >>>> course of thousands of generations or millions of years.'
> >>>
> >>> Which is the fantasy they taught you, not science.
> >>
> >> Nope. Lots of experiments have been run showing that the basic chemicals
> >> of life (amino acids in particular) can arise from simple compounds like
> >> ammonia and methane (et al):
> >>
> > 
> > Where did the ammonia and methane come from?
> 
> They're simple molecules that form spontaneously from free nitrogen, 
> hydrogen and carbon.

Where did they come from? They didn't come from nothing.
> 
> > 
> >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller%E2%80%93Urey_experiment>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> But you accepted what they said.
> >>>
> >>> Because you were *gullible*
> >>
> >> And you believe a book...
> >>
> >> ...because the book tells you to believe it.
> > 
> > You do when you read a science book. You have no argument.
> Nope.
> 
> Because science books reference FACTS.

and lots of theories.



-- 


https://rootbadger.com/invite/i7w9b9K7BUMNXZUDwPUvCxxZYcx4aKXrcoIVKJFt

https://ibb.co/q26Rmhn

https://play.google.com/store/search?q=rootbadger&c=apps&utm_source=na_Med

NNTP friendly.