Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God

In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
> 
> On 2026-08-22 16:11, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
> >>
> >> On 2026-08-22 14:17, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> >>> says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sat, 22 Aug 2026 09:05:26 -0600, Skeeter
> >>>> <[email protected]> in alt.atheism with message-id
> >>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 8/21/2026 1:40 PM, Andrew wrote:
> >>>>>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> >>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote:  > "Andrew" wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> <<>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Folks, if there is no plausible Darwinian pathway for our
> >>>>>>>>>>> origins, then pure logic points us to Creation by a most
> >>>>>>>>>>> awesome and wonderful Creator. . .
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The process is not yet known, that's all.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> For those who accept what science has already discovered, there is no debate.
> >>>>>>>>> They know that....,
> >>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life."
> >>>>>>>>> That is > an established scientific law.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Look it up, its called, "The Law of Biogenesis"
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> No such "law" [sic].
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Gemini:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>       The "Law of Biogenesis" is a *historical term* rather than a rigid universal
> >>>>>>       law. It describes the biological principle that living organisms come only
> >>>>>>       from other living organisms, disproving spontaneous generation. However, it
> >>>>>>       does not rule out abiogenesis.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Look: we get that you're a believer in fairy tales. Stop pretending there's any
> >>>>>> science or "laws" [sic] behind your fairy tales. There isn't any.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So how did we all come about?
> >>>>
> >>>> One of the huge number of things that are not yet known.
> >>>
> >>> Exactly my point. I am just comparing the "god" theory and the science theory.
> >>>
> >>
> >> You are absolutely not doing that.
> > 
> > I have been and now you choose to spin it around because you can't defend your
> > stand. I asked you more than once. Do you believe in God? If so then why? If
> > not than why? You must have some facts that show there can't be a God.
> > Otherwise you wouldn't be sure. You don't know and I promise you when you're on
> > your death bed you will be hoping there is.
> > 
> 
> Nope. You are absolutely not comparing them.

I am and you don't get to make that call.
> 
> I don't believe in any god.

So?
> 
> And no: I don't need to have any facts NOT to believe in something.

Huh?
> 
> Do you believe in the flying spaghetti monster?

And the sealion raises another flag.



-- 


https://rootbadger.com/invite/i7w9b9K7BUMNXZUDwPUvCxxZYcx4aKXrcoIVKJFt

https://ibb.co/q26Rmhn

https://play.google.com/store/search?q=rootbadger&c=apps&utm_source=na_Med

NNTP friendly.