Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God

On 2026-08-23 16:12, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
>>
>> On 2026-08-22 15:43, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2026-08-22 04:26, Andrew wrote:
>>>>> "Alan" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>>>>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>>>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote
>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>>>>> <<>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, if there is no plausible Darwinian pathway for our
>>>>>>>>>>> origins, then pure logic points us to Creation by a most
>>>>>>>>>>> awesome and wonderful Creator. . .
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The process is not yet known, that's all.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For those who accept what science has already discovered, there is
>>>>>>>>> no debate.
>>>>>>>>> They know that....,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That is an established scientific law.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Look it up, its called, "The Law of Biogenesis"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 'A Common Misconception
>>>>>
>>>>> Have any exceptions ever been note?
>>>>> None, except in the fantasy world of
>>>>> the fool.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Some creationists have argued that the law
>>>>>> of biogenesis undermines evolutionary theory
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, it undermines the "goo to you" deceptioen that
>>>>> has deceived the gullible masses, who simply accept
>>>>> whatever they are told.
>>>>>
>>>>>> and the theory that all life originated from
>>>>>> inorganic material billions of years ago.
>>>>>
>>>>> What a bunch of unscientific nonsense!
>>>>>
>>>>>> However, biogenesis simply invalidates
>>>>>> the theory of spontaneous generation?
>>>>>
>>>>> OK, so it's invalidated. And exposes
>>>>> the fact that you have been deceived.
>>>> All it invalidated was the idea that COMPLEX organisms arise sponteneously.
>>>
>>> They can't. What's your point?
>>
>> That that is all that was proven wrong.
>>
>>>>
>>>> In specific, it disproved the notion that flies simply arise from
>>>> rotting meat.
>>>
>>> Nope.
>>>>
>>
>> Yup. That is literally the first way it was tested.
>>
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_generation#Pasteur_and_Tyndall>
>>
>>
>>>> But you didn't bother even looking into it, did you?
>>>
>>> Unlike you who twists things all around?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> it speaks to what can be accomplished in generational time spans, not
>>>>>> over the
>>>>>> course of thousands of generations or millions of years.'
>>>>>
>>>>> Which is the fantasy they taught you, not science.
>>>>
>>>> Nope. Lots of experiments have been run showing that the basic chemicals
>>>> of life (amino acids in particular) can arise from simple compounds like
>>>> ammonia and methane (et al):
>>>>
>>>
>>> Where did the ammonia and methane come from?
>>
>> They're simple molecules that form spontaneously from free nitrogen,
>> hydrogen and carbon.
> 
> Where did they come from? They didn't come from nothing.

You keep using that as if it means anything important.

Your entire argument boils down to:

"I (personally) cannot understand how the universe came to be, and so 
there must be a god involved, and it's OK if I don't understand how he 
came to be...because he's a god and that's different."

It certainly spares you any need to think.

>>
>>>
>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller%E2%80%93Urey_experiment>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But you accepted what they said.
>>>>>
>>>>> Because you were *gullible*
>>>>
>>>> And you believe a book...
>>>>
>>>> ...because the book tells you to believe it.
>>>
>>> You do when you read a science book. You have no argument.
>> Nope.
>>
>> Because science books reference FACTS.
> 
> and lots of theories.
You need to study what a scientific theory is.