Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God
Alan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-08-23 16:13, Skeeter wrote: > In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >> >> On 2026-08-22 16:11, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>> >>>> On 2026-08-22 14:17, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>> says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 22 Aug 2026 09:05:26 -0600, Skeeter >>>>>> <[email protected]> in alt.atheism with message-id >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 8/21/2026 1:40 PM, Andrew wrote: >>>>>>>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:[email protected]... >>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote: > "Andrew" wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> <<>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, if there is no plausible Darwinian pathway for our >>>>>>>>>>>>> origins, then pure logic points us to Creation by a most >>>>>>>>>>>>> awesome and wonderful Creator. . . >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The process is not yet known, that's all. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> For those who accept what science has already discovered, there is no debate. >>>>>>>>>>> They know that...., >>>>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life." >>>>>>>>>>> That is > an established scientific law. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Look it up, its called, "The Law of Biogenesis" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No such "law" [sic]. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Gemini: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The "Law of Biogenesis" is a *historical term* rather than a rigid universal >>>>>>>> law. It describes the biological principle that living organisms come only >>>>>>>> from other living organisms, disproving spontaneous generation. However, it >>>>>>>> does not rule out abiogenesis. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Look: we get that you're a believer in fairy tales. Stop pretending there's any >>>>>>>> science or "laws" [sic] behind your fairy tales. There isn't any. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So how did we all come about? >>>>>> >>>>>> One of the huge number of things that are not yet known. >>>>> >>>>> Exactly my point. I am just comparing the "god" theory and the science theory. >>>>> >>>> >>>> You are absolutely not doing that. >>> >>> I have been and now you choose to spin it around because you can't defend your >>> stand. I asked you more than once. Do you believe in God? If so then why? If >>> not than why? You must have some facts that show there can't be a God. >>> Otherwise you wouldn't be sure. You don't know and I promise you when you're on >>> your death bed you will be hoping there is. >>> >> >> Nope. You are absolutely not comparing them. > > I am and you don't get to make that call. Yes... I do. >> >> I don't believe in any god. > > So? >> >> And no: I don't need to have any facts NOT to believe in something. > > Huh? Was that too hard for your sad little brain? >> >> Do you believe in the flying spaghetti monster? > > And the sealion raises another flag. Nope. It's a serious question. If you don't believe, then according to YOU: "You must have some facts that show there can't be a [flying spaghetti monster]"