Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God
Vincent Maycock <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 23 Aug 2026 16:22:31 -0600, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote: >In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >> >> On 2026-08-23 09:07, Skeeter wrote: >> > In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] >> > says... >> >> >> >> On Sun, 23 Aug 2026 09:37:26 -0600, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] >> >>> says... >> >>>> >> >>>> On Sat, 22 Aug 2026 17:08:58 -0600, Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> On 2026-08-22 14:16, Skeeter wrote: >> >>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] >> >>>>>>> says... >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> That's you. You're the fool who has obediently accepted every nugget of stupid >> >>>>>>>>>> religious bullshit you've been force-fed your entire life. And you always drank >> >>>>>>>>>> all your milk and ate your vegetables, every day. Good boy! >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Yet you nor anyone else can prove otherwise. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Again you demand proof of a negative. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> The universe and all life were created by pink flying >> >>>>>>>> immortal space hamsters. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Prove me wrong. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Actually that makes more sense than a big bang. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Why? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Why wouldn't it. "IF" there is a God then anything is possible. >> >>>> >> >>>> If everything is possible, how can you tell what happened and what >> >>>> didn't? >> >>>> >> >>>>> Yet no one can prove a big bang either. >> >>>> >> >>>> Proofs of the Big Bang: >> >>>> >> >>>> *the cosmic microwave background radiation >> >>>> >> >>>> *the hydrogen/helium ratio in the universe >> >>>> >> >>>> *redshift of distant galaxies >> >>> >> >>> Not proof at all. >> >> >> >> Why not? >> > >> > Because it isn't. >> > >> >> Wow >> >> And your expertise to make that determination is... >> >> ...what again? > >If it was proof then scientists would be making the big announcement. Why >aren't they? It's old news. Some scientists won the Nobel Prize for discovering it back in the 1970s.