Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God

On 8/23/2026 4:29 PM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted 
child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch 
of lies:
> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
>>
>> On 8/23/2026 8:13 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
>> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted another content-free batch
>> of lies:
>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2026-08-22 18:11, Andrew wrote:
>>>>> "OrigInfoJunkie" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>>>>>> On 8/22/2026 11:05 AM, Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>>>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, posted
>>>>>> another content-free batch of lies:
>>>>>>> In article [email protected] says...
>>>>>>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Alan" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Andrew wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, if there is no plausible Darwinian pathway for our
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> origins, then pure logic points us to Creation by a most
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> awesome and wonderful Creator. . .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The process is not yet known, that's all.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who accept what science has already discovered, there
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is no debate.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> They know that....,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is an established scientific law.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Look it up, its called, "The Law of Biogenesis"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 'A Common Misconception
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Have any exceptions ever been note? [sic]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes ? *noted*, not "note."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Some creationists have argued that the law
>>>>>>>>>> of biogenesis undermines evolutionary theory
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, it undermines the "goo to you" deceptioen that
>>>>>>>>> has deceived the gullible masses, who simply accept
>>>>>>>>> whatever they are told.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's you. You're the fool who has obediently accepted every nugget
>>>>>>>> of stupid
>>>>>>>> religious bullshit you've been force-fed your entire life. And you
>>>>>>>> always drank
>>>>>>>> all your milk and ate your vegetables, every day. Good boy!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yet you nor anyone else can prove otherwise.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No one can "prove" anything in this. Instead, we develop theories that
>>>>>> best explain the observations and evidence.
>>>>>
>>>>> You fantasize scenarios all of which happen to be contrary to
>>>>> established science, yet you fail to see that you have been
>>>>> deceived.
>>>>
>>>> Given an example of this: the scenario and the "established science".
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Creation science" isn't such a theory. It's garbage.
>>>>>
>>>>> All evidence tells us that our origins has been the result of
>>>>>       ----- >>>> an intelligent causation <<<<.
>>>>
>>>> What "evidence"?
>>>>
>>>> Start with a single example.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Evolution is the best such theory.
>>>>>
>>>>> For our origins? No way.
>>>> By a long way.
>>>>
>>>> It is as proven as anything non-trivial can be.
>>>
>>> It's still a theory.
>>
>> That's an idiotic thing to say. If a theory explains a phenomenon well, it's a
>> good theory, and we believe it.
> 
> And still a theory.

*The* accepted theory by smart people. Not "just" a theory — the theory that 
best explains what we observe.

You hate science. You don't know science, and that's why you hate it.