Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God
Skeeter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh |
|---|---|
| Organization | UTB |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... > > On 2026-08-23 15:14, Skeeter wrote: > > In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... > >> > >> On 2026-08-22 15:13, Skeeter wrote: > >>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... > >>>> > >>>> On 2026-08-22 13:59, Skeeter wrote: > >>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 2026-08-22 08:07, Skeeter wrote: > >>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] > >>>>>>> says... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2026 16:55:13 -0600, Skeeter > >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> in alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 2026-08-21 15:27, Skeeter wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>>> says... > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2026 10:53:22 -0600, Skeeter > >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> in alt.atheism with message-id > >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2026-08-21 09:08, Andrew wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, if there is no plausible Darwinian pathway for our > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> origins, then pure logic points us to Creation by a most > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> awesome and wonderful Creator. . . > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The process is not yet known, that's all. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For those who accept what science has already discovered, there is no > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> debate. They know that...., > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life." > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is > an established scientific law. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it absolutely is not. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Then tell us how i all went down. No big bang shit either. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> No one knows the origin of life - yet. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> It's all theories. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> But the scientific theories are backed up by observed facts. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> So someone watched the big bang? Did someone actually the first form of life? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Those are theories, subject to change with new data. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> All theories, no facts. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Lots of facts. > >>>>> > >>>>> OK, Tell me how it all started and prove it with facts. > >>>> > >>>> Again, you want ALL the answers and if I can't provide all the answers > >>>> you'll deny every fact. > >>> > >>> What facts? You haven't posted any. I have. Matter cannot be eternal. That IS > >>> science. Now show me fact on how it all came about. You can't so you want to > >>> twist what I say. You are a bad troll. > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You just want to ignore them. > >>>>> > >>>>> I pay attention to all of it. Science is man made so the results are also. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> In this, how are you any different than a flat-earther? > >>>>> > >>>>> And he changes it again. The earth was proven round a long time ago. No facts > >>>>> needed. No one has proven how everything came about. That's why I keep an open > >>>>> mind. No one has the right to tell another person there is no God when they > >>>>> don't even know themselves. > >>>> Actually the Earth was proven round WITH FACTS. > >>> > >>> I never said it wasn't. > >> Do you not even remember what you type a single day later? > >> > >> "The earth was proven round a long time ago. No facts needed." > > > > So? Semantics again. You're playing word twisting again. > > Nope. You literally said that "No facts" were "needed" to prove the > Earth was round. > > No semantics in that. Do you need facts to prove you have 2 arms? It's obvious. -- https://rootbadger.com/invite/i7w9b9K7BUMNXZUDwPUvCxxZYcx4aKXrcoIVKJFt https://ibb.co/q26Rmhn https://play.google.com/store/search?q=rootbadger&c=apps&utm_source=na_Med NNTP friendly.