Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God

In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
> 
> On 2026-08-23 16:12, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
> >>
> >> On 2026-08-22 15:43, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2026-08-22 04:26, Andrew wrote:
> >>>>> "Alan" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> >>>>>> Andrew wrote:
> >>>>>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote:
> >>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> "Attila" wrote
> >>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> <<>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Folks, if there is no plausible Darwinian pathway for our
> >>>>>>>>>>> origins, then pure logic points us to Creation by a most
> >>>>>>>>>>> awesome and wonderful Creator. . .
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The process is not yet known, that's all.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> For those who accept what science has already discovered, there is
> >>>>>>>>> no debate.
> >>>>>>>>> They know that....,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> That is an established scientific law.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Look it up, its called, "The Law of Biogenesis"
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "Life comes only from previously existing life."
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 'A Common Misconception
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Have any exceptions ever been note?
> >>>>> None, except in the fantasy world of
> >>>>> the fool.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Some creationists have argued that the law
> >>>>>> of biogenesis undermines evolutionary theory
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes, it undermines the "goo to you" deceptioen that
> >>>>> has deceived the gullible masses, who simply accept
> >>>>> whatever they are told.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> and the theory that all life originated from
> >>>>>> inorganic material billions of years ago.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What a bunch of unscientific nonsense!
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> However, biogenesis simply invalidates
> >>>>>> the theory of spontaneous generation?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> OK, so it's invalidated. And exposes
> >>>>> the fact that you have been deceived.
> >>>> All it invalidated was the idea that COMPLEX organisms arise sponteneously.
> >>>
> >>> They can't. What's your point?
> >>
> >> That that is all that was proven wrong.
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> In specific, it disproved the notion that flies simply arise from
> >>>> rotting meat.
> >>>
> >>> Nope.
> >>>>
> >>
> >> Yup. That is literally the first way it was tested.
> >>
> >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_generation#Pasteur_and_Tyndall>
> >>
> >>
> >>>> But you didn't bother even looking into it, did you?
> >>>
> >>> Unlike you who twists things all around?
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> it speaks to what can be accomplished in generational time spans, not
> >>>>>> over the
> >>>>>> course of thousands of generations or millions of years.'
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Which is the fantasy they taught you, not science.
> >>>>
> >>>> Nope. Lots of experiments have been run showing that the basic chemicals
> >>>> of life (amino acids in particular) can arise from simple compounds like
> >>>> ammonia and methane (et al):
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Where did the ammonia and methane come from?
> >>
> >> They're simple molecules that form spontaneously from free nitrogen,
> >> hydrogen and carbon.
> > 
> > Where did they come from? They didn't come from nothing.
> 
> You keep using that as if it means anything important.
> 
> Your entire argument boils down to:
> 
> "I (personally) cannot understand how the universe came to be, and so 
> there must be a god involved, and it's OK if I don't understand how he 
> came to be...because he's a god and that's different."
> 
> It certainly spares you any need to think.
> 
> >>
> >>>
> >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller%E2%80%93Urey_experiment>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But you accepted what they said.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Because you were *gullible*
> >>>>
> >>>> And you believe a book...
> >>>>
> >>>> ...because the book tells you to believe it.
> >>>
> >>> You do when you read a science book. You have no argument.
> >> Nope.
> >>
> >> Because science books reference FACTS.
> > 
> > and lots of theories.
> You need to study what a scientific theory is.

It's theory. Just like it says. 


-- 


https://rootbadger.com/invite/i7w9b9K7BUMNXZUDwPUvCxxZYcx4aKXrcoIVKJFt

https://ibb.co/q26Rmhn

https://play.google.com/store/search?q=rootbadger&c=apps&utm_source=na_Med

NNTP friendly.