Re: Atheist Wakes Up In Morgue - After Meeting God

In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
> 
> On 2026-08-23 16:35, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
> >>
> >> On 2026-08-23 08:23, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2026-08-22 14:20, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2026-08-22 06:41, Andrew wrote:
> >>>>>>> "Samuel Spade" wrote in message
> >>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> As time goes on genomes are functionally refined, not degraded.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> That is true,in your fantasy. But in the real world mutations are
> >>>>>>> continuously going on
> >>>>>>> in the genome also .
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> And?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Mutations are word-processing errors in the cell's instruction manual.
> >>>>>>> They systematically destroy genetic information
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Nope. That's completely false.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Prove it.
> >>>>
> >>>> Isn't your rule that you have to prove me wrong?
> >>>
> >>> Just admit you can't.
> >>
> >> Mutations can produced both positive and negative results.
> >>
> >> Just like a typo on a cheque can result in someone either getting less
> >> OR more than was intended.
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Selection may slow mutational degeneration, but not stop it.
> >>>>>>> So even with selection, evolution is going the wrong way. It is going
> >>>>>>> toward *extinction,* rather than towards a higher taxonomic level.
> >>>>>>> Thus telling us that the word devolution better defines what is going
> >>>>>>> on, rather than evolution.
> >>>>>>> I hope this helps.
> >>>>>> Mutations can be detrimental OR beneficial.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The ones that are detrimental result in that organism competing less
> >>>>>> successfully, while the ones that are beneficial result in an organism
> >>>>>> that is MORE successful.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Successful at what? Cancer is a mutation.
> >>>> That's an unsuccessful mutation.
> >>>
> >>> So where did the Cancer come from?
> >> A mutation. An error in a cell which removed the restraints on its rate
> >> of replication. And "cancer" doesn't get a capital letter.
> > 
> > Where did that cell come from?
> > 
> 
> You're trying to construct a long drawn-out straw man.
> 
> The fact that the ultimate answer to where everything comes from is "I 
> don't know" doesn't make a god any more likely an explanation, nor does 
> it remove the logical extension that if a god is the cause, you still 
> need to ask where IT came from.

You are spinning again. If you don't know then God can be put into the 
equation. I never said God "IS" the cause. I said that until we can "prove" 
where it all started then God is an option. You are trying to spin to win.

-- 


https://rootbadger.com/invite/i7w9b9K7BUMNXZUDwPUvCxxZYcx4aKXrcoIVKJFt

https://ibb.co/q26Rmhn

https://play.google.com/store/search?q=rootbadger&c=apps&utm_source=na_Med

NNTP friendly.